Aquatic Botany 96 (2012) 63–66
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Aquatic Botany
j ourna l ho me page: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot
Short communication
Starch grain morphology of the seagrasses Halodule wrightii, Ruppia maritima,
Syringodium filiforme, and Thalassia testudinum
Stephanie Peek
∗
, Mark T. Clementz
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Dept. #3006, 1000 E. University Ave, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 22 July 2011
Received in revised form 1 October 2011
Accepted 4 October 2011
Available online 12 October 2011
Keywords:
Starch grain
Morphology
Seagrass
Halodule wrightii
Ruppia maritima
Syringodium filiforme
Thalassia testudinum
a b s t r a c t
Starch grains are a ubiquitous component of plants that have been used in tandem with phytoliths,
pollen, and macrofossils to reconstruct past floral diversity. This tool has yet to be fully explored for
aquatic plants, specifically seagrasses, which lack phytoliths and are rarely preserved as macrofossils or
pollen. If starch grains in seagrasses are morphologically distinct, this method has the potential to improve
seagrass identification in the fossil record in such cases where its starch is preserved (e.g. scratches and
occlusal surfaces of tooth enamel from seagrass consumers). The goals of this study were twofold: (1) to
determine if starch is present in seagrass material and (2) to assess how starch grain morphology differs
between different seagrasses.
This study focused on four abundant and ecologically distinct seagrasses from the Caribbean: Halodule
wrightii, Ruppia maritima, Syringodium filiforme, and Thalassia testudinum. Starch grains were observed in
all species except S. filiforme. Grains from H. wrightii are typically observed in side-on orientation, are sub-
round to angular, and are fairly small (3-19 m, end-on). Grains of R. maritima are small spherical grains
(4–8 m) that have a centric hilum and a straight extinction cross with a median angle between the arms
of 90
◦
. Grains from T. testudinum are large (9–31 m, end-on), conical in side-on and round/sub-round
in end-on orientation, have a slightly eccentric hilum with an obvious particle, and prominent lamellae.
Visual assessment and comparative statistics demonstrate that the morphology of starch grains from T.
testudinum, R. maritima, and H. wrightii are significantly different. With more extensive research, there is
potential for the positive identification of starch grains from an unknown seagrass. The ability to identify
seagrass from starch grains could facilitate the identification of seagrasses in the fossil record and supply
information on seagrass evolution and distribution, climate effects on seagrass distribution, and the diets
of seagrass consumers.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Fossil evidence of seagrasses is known since the late Creta-
ceous but fossil localities are limited to only a handful of sites
(Brasier, 1975; Lumbert et al., 1984), as plant remains of seagrasses
are rare and nearly impossible to identify without the preserva-
tion of reproductive parts (Brasier, 1975). Additionally, seagrasses
do not have phytoliths and their pollen is not preserved because
it lacks exine (Brasier, 1975; Domning, 1982). For these reasons,
the identification of fossil seagrasses primarily relies on associ-
ated fauna (e.g. foraminifera, mollusks, echinoids, crustaceans, and
sirenians) and distinctive sedimentary features of seagrass commu-
nities (Brasier, 1975). However these identification methods have
limitations, some of which could be overcome if starch grains from
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 307 766 6048; fax: +1 307 766 6679.
E-mail addresses: speek@uwyo.edu (S. Peek), mclemen1@uwyo.edu
(M.T. Clementz).
different species of seagrasses are distinct and are preserved in the
fossil record.
Starch is the energy source of a plant and, while present in all
plant parts, it is most heavily concentrated in storage organs (i.e.
roots, tubers, rhizomes, fruits, and seeds) (Gott et al., 2006). Starch
grains occur in a variety of characteristic forms that can be used to
identify plants to family and genus level, sometimes even species
(Reichert, 1913). Starch is also highly resistant to alteration, which
has enabled it to be preserved in a variety of climate regions rang-
ing from arid to tropical and recovered from several substrates,
including fecal material (Barton and Matthews, 2006); cracks, pits,
and crevices in pottery, millstones, or other grinding tools and
associated soils recovered from archaeological sites (Samuel, 1996;
Piperno and Holst, 1998; Lentfer et al., 2002; Piperno et al., 2004;
Barton and Matthews, 2006; Perry et al., 2007); and pyritized starch
grains have even been found in rocks of Eocene age (Wilkinson,
1983). Unaltered starch grains could be preserved in the fossil
record if they are protected from destructive elements such as
microorganisms, soil moisture, soil pH, and oxygen following rapid
0304-3770/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.10.001