AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA SOCIETY FOR AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA
SECTION EDITOR
PAUL F. WHITE
Effective Treatment of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain
with Intravenous Followed by Oral COX-2 Specific Inhibitor
Girish P. Joshi, MBBS, MD, Eugene R. Viscusi, MD, Tong J. Gan, MD, Harold Minkowitz, MD,
Mark Cippolle, MD, PhD, Rienhard Schuller, MSc, Raymond Y. Cheung, BPharm, PhD, and
John G. Fort, MD
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, Texas
In this multicenter, double-blinded, randomized,
placebo-controlled study we evaluated the analgesic
and opioid-sparing efficacy of a preoperative dose of IV
parecoxib followed by oral valdecoxib in treating pain
associated with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Patients were randomized to receive a single IV dose of
parecoxib 40 mg (n = 134) or placebo (n = 129) 30 –
45 min before induction of anesthesia. Six to 12 h after
the IV dose, the parecoxib group received a single oral
dose of valdecoxib 40 mg, followed by valdecoxib
40 mg qd on postoperative days 1– 4, then 40 mg qd prn
days 5–7. The placebo IV group received oral placebo
on an identical schedule. All patients were allowed sup-
plemental IV fentanyl as needed during the first 4 h
postoperatively (T0 –240 min) followed by hydroc-
odone 5 mg/acetaminophen 500 mg (Vicodin
®
; 1–2 tab-
lets orally every 4 – 6 h as needed). Patients taking pare-
coxib used 21% less fentanyl than those receiving
placebo (P = 0.011). The mean area under the curve of
pain intensity (PI) scores over time from T0 –240 min
was 55.2 for parecoxib and 61.2 for placebo (P = 0.083).
At T180 and T240 min, mean PI score was 7.0 and 7.6
points lower in the parecoxib group, respectively (P
0.02). Fewer patients on valdecoxib required supple-
mental analgesics (P 0.05) after discharge. At
T240 min and at day 7, Patient’s and Physician’s/
Nurse’s Global Evaluations were significantly better in
the parecoxib/valdecoxib group (P 0.05). Incidences
of adverse events, adverse events causing withdrawal,
and serious adverse events were less for parecoxib/
valdecoxib than for placebo. The authors conclude that
preoperative parecoxib is a valuable opioid-sparing ad-
junct to the standard of care for treating pain after lapa-
roscopic cholecystectomy, and subsequent treatment
with oral valdecoxib extends this clinical benefit.
(Anesth Analg 2004;98:336 –42)
F
or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), pain is
both the most frequent complaint and the most
common cause of delayed discharge after the
procedure (1,2). Pain associated with outpatient LC is
usually managed with opioid analgesics, often in con-
junction with acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal an-
tiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Opioids are effective
analgesics, but their usefulness is limited by side ef-
fects, such as somnolence, nausea and vomiting, con-
stipation, and respiratory depression (3). Nonopioids
(e.g., acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and local anesthetics)
have opioid-sparing effects (4 – 6).
Valdecoxib is a highly specific inhibitor of the
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme, recently approved
in the United States for the treatment of arthritis and
dysmenorrhea, that is being investigated for use in
postsurgical pain (7). Parecoxib is a parenterally ad-
ministered inactive prodrug that undergoes rapid
amide hydrolysis in vivo to the pharmacologically ac-
tive COX-2 inhibitor, valdecoxib (8). This study was
performed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a pre-
operative dose of IV parecoxib, followed by oral
valdecoxib, for treating postoperative pain in patients
undergoing elective LC. The principal hypothesis was
that patients receiving these analgesics would experi-
ence less pain and require less supplemental opioid
analgesia than patients receiving placebo.
Methods
This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized,
placebo-controlled study was conducted in accor-
dance with good clinical practice and the Declaration
of Helsinki. An IRB at each of the 24 study sites
Supported, in part, by Pharmacia Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Accepted for publication August 14, 2003.
Address correspondence to Girish P. Joshi, MBBS, MD, FFARCSI,
Professor of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas,
TX 75390-9068. Address email to girish.joshi@utsouthwestern.edu.
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093390.94921.4A
©2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society
336 Anesth Analg 2004;98:336–42 0003-2999/04