Original Research
Resolution Improvement in Thick-Slab Magnetic
Resonance Digital Subtraction Angiography Using
SENSE at 3T
Paul E. Summers, PhD,
*
Spyros S. Kollias, MD, and Anton Valavanis, MD
Purpose: To evaluate the use of parallel imaging (sensitiv-
ity encoding [SENSE]) to improve spatial resolution and
achieve sub-second temporal resolution in fluoroscopic
contrast-enhanced, magnetic resonance digital subtrac-
tion angiography (MR-DSA).
Materials and Methods: A MR-DSA sequence was opti-
mized on a 3-T scanner with respect to sampling bandwidth
and SENSE acceleration factor subject to the constraints of
half-second acquisition time and 0.6 1.2 mm in-plane
resolution. MR-DSA with and without SENSE acceleration
was then evaluated in patients with arterio-venous malfor-
mations (AVMs).
Results: Consistent with previously reported results and
theory, SENSE factors greater than two and increasing
sampling bandwidth both led to increasing image noise.
Compared to lower resolution MR-DSA images with
similar temporal resolution, the SENSE accelerated se-
quence provided better spatial resolution without notable
changes in the contrast enhancement of the vascular
territories of the AVMs but was hampered somewhat in
the late venous phases by a reconstruction artifact.
Conclusion: SENSE acceleration of MR-DSA by a factor
of two allows improved temporal or spatial resolution
without significant loss of image quality. Signal-to-noise
degradation associated with higher SENSE acceleration
factors are likely to necessitate other approaches to fur-
ther improving resolution in MR-DSA. Clinically, SENSE
accelerated MR-DSA improves the non-invasive pre- and
postoperative depiction of AVM flow dynamics.
Key Words: magnetic resonance angiography; MR-DSA;
parallel imaging; arterio-venous malformations.
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;20:662– 673.
© 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REPEATEDLY ACQUIRING T1-WEIGHTED magnetic
resonance (MR) images during the first passage of an
injected, T1-shortening contrast agent, together with
digital subtraction of an image acquired before the ar-
rival of contrast, can be used to selectively image vas-
cular structures without interference from overlying
tissues (1). This technique, magnetic resonance digital
subtraction angiography (MR-DSA), is widely used for
extracranial MR angiography where volumetric data
sets can be acquired over the course of a few seconds
without contamination of the arterial phase images by
venous structures (2– 4). The temporal resolution of
such three-dimensional MR-DSA studies is, however,
inadequate for visualizing the dynamics of contrast
passage through the intracranial vasculature. This is
particularly relevant in the diagnostic and follow-up
imaging of high-flow arterio-venous malformations
(AVMs).
Notably, the gold standard for intracranial vascular
studies—intra-arterial digital subtraction (IA-DSA)—is
performed in projection mode with high temporal and
in-plane spatial resolution but without depth discrimi-
nation. The utility of IA-DSA indicates that depth infor-
mation is not critical to the interpretation of temporally
resolved images. Thus, a major reduction in imaging
time can be made by acquiring projection images (two-
dimensional MR-DSA) rather than three-dimensional
datasets (5,6). Several previous reports have demon-
strated two-dimensional MR-DSA with one-second
temporal resolution for visualization of intracranial
AVMs (7–10). This has typically involved the acquisition
of 256 readout samples, and 200 phase encoding steps
with a 5-msec repetition time. For a field of view (FOV)
of 20 cm, sampling theory dictates that the spatial res-
olution is limited to 1.75–2 mm. Thus, two-dimensional
MR-DSA compares poorly with both the micron-scale
spatial and tens of frames per second temporal resolu-
Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Swit-
zerland.
Contract grant sponsor: Swiss National Science Foundation; Contract
grant number: 3200B0-100355.
Parts of this work were presented as Poster 2263 at the 2003 meeting of
the ISMRM.
*Address reprint requests to: P.S., Institute of Neuroradiology, Univer-
sity Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zurich, Switzer-
land. E-mail: paul.summers@usz.ch
Received August 21, 2003; Accepted May 24, 2004.
DOI 10.1002/jmri.20156
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 20:662– 673 (2004)
© 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 662