Ecological Economics 30 (1999) 29 – 46
ANALYSIS
Alleviating soil erosion/pollution stock externalities: alternative
roles for government
Edna T. Loehman *, Timothy O. Randhir
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue Uniersity, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Received 1 March 1994; received in revised form 15 June 1998; accepted 18 June 1998
Abstract
This paper addresses two temporal externalities due to agriculture: soil erosion and related pollution. The
possibility of decentralization of decisions, the appropriate role of a resource manager, and the efficiency of
alternative policies are examined using traditional welfare economics concepts for a two-sector model of rural – urban
linkage. Three alternative types of policies can be socially efficient, but imply different involvement by government,
and have different knowledge requirements. A Pigouvian policy requires full information. A bargaining solution
involves government only in setting an entitlement, but it may require too much knowledge by rural households in
terms of understanding dynamic environmental relationships. A third way is that government and rural households
be co-producers of environmental goods. This concept assigns government the responsibility for maintaining
knowledge about environmental relationships, and government is a participant in a market system that determines
prices for environmental-related goods. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Soil erosion; Pollution; Stock externalities; Policies; Incentives; Tax; Subsidy; Bargaining entitlements;
Decentralization
1. Introduction
Soil degradation is a common occurrence in
Third World countries as growing populations try
to satisfy subsistence requirements with limited
resources. If current trends continue, agricultural
output will not be sustainable in the long run in
many areas. For example, from an interview with
a scientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in
1988: ‘Unless urgent measures are undertaken,
desertification will erode an additional 29000
square miles by the year 2000, more than twice
the area of Taiwan’ (Postel, 1991). This is an
example of the ‘tragedy of the commons,’ consid-
ering soil quality to be a common property
resource.
* Corresponding author. Fax: +1 765 4949176; e-mail:
Loehman@agecon.purdue.edu
0921-8009/99/$ - see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0921-8009(98)00067-6