Libri, Vol. 61, pp. 226–238, September 2011 Copyright © by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. DOI 10.1515/libr.2011.019
Challenges of Managing Indigenous Knowledge with other
Knowledge Systems for Agricultural Growth in sub-Saharan
Africa
Edda Tandi Lwoga, Patrick Ngulube,
and Christine Stilwell
Dr. Edda Tandi Lwoga, Librarian and Acting
Director, Directorate of Library Services, Muhimbili
University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es
Salaam, Tanzania
Email: tlwoga@muhas.ac.tz; tlwoga@gmail.com
Dr. Patrick Ngulube, Professor, School of Graduate
Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South
Africa
Email: ngulup@unisa.ac.za
Dr. Christine Stilwell, Professor, Information
Studies Programme, School of Sociology and Social
Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville,
South Africa
Email: Stilwell@ukzn.ac.za
Abstract
This article provides a systematic analysis of the
challenges of managing agricultural indigenous
knowledge (IK), and accessing external knowledge
in the rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa, with a spe-
cific focus on Tanzania. Semi-structured interviews
were used to collect primary data from 181 small-
scale farmers in the six districts of Tanzania. The
findings indicated that farmers faced various chal-
lenges in managing their IK, and accessing external
knowledge, which ranged from personal and social
barriers, to factors in the external environment such
as infrastructure, policy, Intellectual Property Rights
(IPR), and weak linkages between research, exten-
sion services and farmers. Farmers also faced chal-
lenges when using information and communication
technologies (ICTs) to manage their knowledge,
such as personal, socio-cultural, infrastructural, tech-
nical, and economic factors. It is thus important for
the government to improve access to extension ser-
vices, review the IPR system, enhance rural electrifi-
cation, telecommunications and roads infrastructure.
Further, the knowledge providers (i.e. agricultural
extension officers, researchers, educators, libraries,
non governmental organisations, civil society, and
other agricultural actors) should nurture a knowl-
edge sharing culture. Farmers need to be assisted
and trained to document their knowledge, map com-
munities’ IK bearers and innovators, use multiple
formats (print and ICTs) with traditional communica-
tion channels (for instance, folklore and apprentice-
ships) specific to a local context to disseminate
knowledge. Participatory approaches should be em-
ployed in knowledge production and dissemination
in order to include farmers’ needs and expressing
knowledge in the resulting technologies, practices
and new knowledge. In this way linkages between
indigenous and external knowledge would be en-
hanced for improved farming activities in the local
communities.
Background and context
Indigenous knowledge (IK) is an important asset
with regard to the social capital of local people and
constitutes the main resource for their livelihoods.
The term, indigenous knowledge is often used inter-
changeably to refer to local knowledge. However,
local knowledge refers to the knowledge possessed
by any group living off the land in a particular area
for a long period of time (Langill 1999). IK on the
other hand, while embracing exogenous knowledge
which entered the local community over time (van
Vlaenderen 2000) differs from local knowledge as
the emphasis tends towards knowledge internal to a
particular setting. In this context, it is not important
whether the people in the local communities are the
original inhabitants of an area or not. The aim of the
study was to learn how people interact with the en-
vironment to improve their knowledge base and
farming activities. Thus, this study used the two
terms (indigenous and local knowledge) interchange-
ably to encompass all the above-mentioned terms.
IK is mainly tacit, unique, non-systematic, derived
from local experiments, innovations, creativity, skills