Neighborhood Walkability and
Sedentary Time in Belgian Adults
Delfien Van Dyck, MA, Greet Cardon, PhD, Benedicte Deforche, PhD, Neville Owen, PhD,
James F. Sallis, PhD, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, PhD
Background: Sedentary behavior (too much sitting) has deleterious health consequences that are
distinct from lack of physical activity (too little exercise).
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the associations of neighborhood walkability and sociode-
mographic factors with adults’ self-reported and objectively assessed sedentary time.
Methods: This Belgian cross-sectional study was conducted between May 2007 and September
2008. Twenty-four neighborhoods were stratifıed on GIS-based walkability and neighborhood SES.
In all, 1200 adults (aged 20 – 65 years; 50 per neighborhood; 42.7 [SD=12.6] years; 47.9% men)
completed a sociodemographic survey and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. They
also wore an accelerometer for 7 days: Sedentary time was identifıed as accelerometer counts of less
than 100 per minute. Statistical analyses were performed in 2009, using multilevel regression models,
adjusted for physical activity levels and individual SES.
Results: Residents of high-walkable neighborhoods reported more sitting time than those of
low-walkable neighborhoods (439.8 vs 403.4 minutes/day of daily sitting time, p0.05). Living in
high-walkable versus low-walkable neighborhoods was also associated with 2.9% more accelerometer-
measured overall sedentary time (p0.001). Being male, younger, unemployed, more highly edu-
cated, having a white-collar job (analysis for employed adults only), and living without children were
all signifıcantly associated with more sitting time.
Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, living in a high-walkable neighborhood was associated
with higher levels of sedentary time. If future studies in other contexts confırm these associations,
environmental and policy innovations aiming to promote physical activity may need to address the
potential negative health impact of sedentary behavior.
(Am J Prev Med 2010;39(1):25–32) © 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Introduction
P
hysical activity is generally known to be related to a
lower risk of obesity, diabetes, coronary heart dis-
ease, and some cancers.
1–3
However, results from
different studies
3–9
showed that achieving high levels of
physical activity alone is not enough to experience health
benefıts; moreover, other behaviors, like eating behaviors
and sedentary behaviors, are important to consider. Evi-
dence from studies in youth
10,11
and adults
12
showed that
physical activity and sedentary behavior are poorly cor-
related; individuals who are sedentary for large amounts
of time were found to be almost as likely to meet physical
activity recommendations as those who are less seden-
tary.
12
In that context, an Australian study
9
found that a
combination of more sedentary behavior and suffıcient
physical activity was similarly related to the risk of obesity
as a combination of less-sedentary behavior and insuffı-
cient physical activity. For both combinations, the odds
of being obese were 1.6 times higher compared to low
levels of sedentary behavior and suffıcient physical activ-
ity. Further, other studies showed that both self-reported
and objectively assessed sedentary time are consistently
associated with elevated risk of obesity, diabetes, cardio-
vascular disease, cancer, the metabolic syndrome and
total mortality, and that all these associations exist inde-
pendent of physical activity levels.
3–8
From the Fund for Scientifıc Research Flanders (FWO) (Van Dyck, De-
forche); Department of Movement and Sports Sciences (Van Dyck, Car-
don, Deforche, De Bourdeaudhuij), Ghent University, Ghent; Department
of Human Biometrics and Biomechanics (Deforche), Vrije Universiteit
Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; School of Population Health (Owen), The
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; and Department of Psychol-
ogy (Sallis), San Diego State University, San Diego, California
Address correspondence to: Delfıen Van Dyck, MA, Faculty of Medicine
and Health Sciences, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent
University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: Delfıen.
VanDyck@UGent.be.
0749-3797/$17.00
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.004
© 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine • Published by Elsevier Inc. Am J Prev Med 2010;39(1)25–32 25