Interaction of Polyethylenglycol Coated
Liposomes and Plain Liposomes Studied using
Fluorescent Probes
D. Polo
1
, I. Haro
1
, M. A. Alsina†
2
and F. Reig
1
1
Peptides Department, CID–CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
2
Physicochemical Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Plaza Pius XII, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Biomed. Chromatogr. 11, 75–76, (1997) No. of Figures: 2. No. of Tables: 0. No. of Refs: 4.
INTRODUCTION
Liposomes have been used extensively as carriers for drug
administration and targeting. Their in vivo half life can be
dramatically increased by coating the surface with poly-
ethylene glycol (PEG) chains (Trubetskoy and Torchilin,
1995).
Although phosphatidyl ethanolamine–PEG derivative
(PG–PEG) only represents around 4% of total lipids, the
length and hydrophilicity of PEG chains can modify to
some extent the stability of liposomes as far as leakage,
microviscosity of bilayers etc. are concerned.
In the present paper we compare some physicochemical
characteristics of four liposomal preparations currently used
in biological studies.
EXPERIMENTAL
Chemicals. Phosphatidyl choline (PC) was a preparation of
hydrogenated egg lecithin from Asahi (Japan). Phosphatidyl
glycerol (PG) and cholesterol (Ch) were from Sigma. Doxorubicin
(DX) was obtained from Farmitalia, Carlo Erba (Italy). Diphenyl
hexatriene (DPH) was supplied by Fluka. Di-stearoyl phosphatidyl
ethanolamine–PEG (DSPE–PEG) of 2000 Da molecular weight
was from Shearwater Polymers Europe (Netherlands).
Peptide E(8) (17 AA) and N-glutaryl phosphatidyl ethanolamine
(NGPE) were synthesized in our laboratory. Details of the
syntheses and physicochemical studies are described elsewhere
(Polo et al., 1996).
Physicochemical studies. Surface activity was determined using a
Langmuir-Blodgett balance working with a mini-
cuvette of Teflon (70 mL capacity).
Compression iostherms were carried out spreading liposomal
suspensions on a subphase of sodium chloride 0.9%.
Bilayer fluidity was studied through polarization changes of
DPH molecules, inserted in lipid bilayers, in the temperature range
of 25–60°C. Details of all these procedures are given in Bogdam
et al. (1994).
Liposome preparation. Vesicles were prepared mixing all the
lipidic components in an organic medium, followed by evapora-
tion, rehydration, probe sonication and incubation with
doxorubicin. When necessary the peptide was linked to the vesicle
surface through the carboxyl moiety of NGPE.
RESULTS
Liposomes. Liposomes were prepared according to standard
procedures given in the literature (Nagayasu et al., 1994).
Final preparations were characterized by size and phos-
pholipid, peptide and doxorubicin quantification. Vesicle
compositions were: (A) PC/PG/Ch/DX; (B) PC/PG/Ch/DX/
PE–PEG; (C) PC/PG/Ch/DX/PE–PEG/NGPE/E(8); (D)
PC/PG/Ch/PE–PEG/NGPE/E(8).
Correspondence to: F. Reig.
Figure 1. Time course of surface pressure increases determined
for C liposomes.
Figure 2. Surface pressure increases versus concentration for
B, C and D liposomes.
CCC 0269–3879/97/020075–02 $17.50 Received 21 May 1996
© 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 17 June 1996
BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, VOL. 11, 75–76 (1997)