1 Copyright © 2007 by ASME              !!  "#$#%& ’#(%’%’# # %) "*+’&’%, "  *’&&,* %’%#’ )%%& ’# %) ’#*#%& "*’# #$ %’# * - ).   / 0   #1 23  . 0 . #1 4 -* / /5/.6673/-6 8 ). !   / 0   #1 23  . 0 . #1 4 -* / 9/!74!-6 &-    / 0   #1 23  . 0 . #1 4 -* / 67.-.- #- $ : $;6  /  23   0 %/3 %< = .7/6-6 +%*%> In the present study, a basic comparison between the cold formability of a commercially"pure Titanium (CP Ti) sheet in the single"point incremental forming (SPIF) and stamping processes is presented. An attempt was made to evaluate the SPIF formability by employing two tests. In the first test, parts having continuously varying wall angles were formed. While in the second test, parts having fixed wall angles were formed. The stamping formability was determined by conducting the limiting dome height (LDH) test. It is concluded that the forming limit curve (FLC) in SPIF is located much higher than the stamping FLC, even higher than the fracture limit curve in stamping. Moreover, the SPIF formability shows dependence on the test employed. ?, 8*$> Incremental forming, Conventional forming, Cold formability, Titanium sheet"metal - ’#%*$%’#> The titanium metal is paid much attention for its properties of lightness, anti"rust and high specific strength. Because of these properties, titanium has been a potential material for structural components and attracts much attention from the aeronautical, chemical, electrical and electronics industries. In addition, the metal, due to its good adaptability for the living body, is used to many manufacture medical products. Applications continue to expand although aerospace usage remains the largest. Though several conventional sheet"metal forming processes, such as power spinning, press forming, rubber pad forming, stretch forming and roll forming, can be employed to form the titanium sheet metal components [1], the sheet formability in these processes is limited. Thus, thermal activation is required to improve the sheet formability in these processes, especially stamping as shown in [2]. Even if the formability can be improved at the elevated temperatures, a manufacturing process at the room temperature is always desired for the reasons of cost"effectiveness and better mechanical properties. In order to fulfill these objectives, a number of forming processes were developed in the last decade [3"6]. Among these, due to its flexibility, low"cost tooling, single point incremental forming (SPIF) has attained a great attention. The SPIF process is still under development phase. Rapid prototyping and manufacturing of complex shapes and customized medical products are some examples of its industrial applications investigated so far [7"9]. For making it more useful, further investigations are needed. Proceedings of the 2007 International Manufacturing Science And Engineering Conference MSEC2007 October 15-17, 2007, Atlanta, Georgia, USA MSEC2007-31138 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 02/01/2016 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use