Studies of transverse multi-bunch beam breakup in E-linac Dobrin Kaltchev, Richard Baartman, Yu-Chiu Chao, Philipp Kolb, Shane Koscielniak, Lia Merminga, Amiya Mitra, Vladimir Zvyagintsev TRIUMF, Vancouver B.C., Canada Introduction This paper presents the results from our simulations of single-pass transverse beam-breakup (BBU) effects in E-linac [1]. For the initial single-pass operation of E-linac, a 300 KeV CW electron beam will be injected into a 9- cell Tesla cavity (maximum gradient 10 MV/m) fol- lowed by a beam transport line – quadrupoles and a magnetic dipole chicane, and then accelerated in the main linac section consisting of four such cavities to a final energy of about 45 MeV. The bunch repetition rate is either 650 MHz (fission beam), or 100-110 MHz (high-brightness beam) for the same average current (10 to 30 mA). Each bunch feels the accumulated effects of the long- range wakefields of all the preceding bunches – the amplitude of oscillation of the bunches increases. The conditions for such orbit growth to occur are injection errors and/or cavity misalignments, combined with the presence of dipole high-order modes (HOMs) in the cavity field with high quality factors Q and shunt impedances R/Q. E-linac optics and BBU tool An optics code that includes standing-wave acceler- ating structures as optics elements was created by in- serting the 9-cell cavity matrix in MadX. The matrix is derived by integrating numerically the equations of motion in a standing-wave cavity as given by E.Chambers [2]. E-linac lattice used in BBU simulations (MadX, Astra, Mathematica) BBU model We assume an injection error at the first cavity en- trance x 0 =1 mm equal to one-third of the r.m.s. beam size. A zero-emittance beam, aligned to the beam el- lipse at this point, is tracked in the presence of the 26 dipole HOMs. The beam consists of 10 6 bunches, equally spaced. We use rms cavity-to-cavity HOM fre- quency spread 0.1 MHz and a bunch-to-bunch charge jitter rms = 5% of the nominal bunch charge. The rms orbit offset is defined as the r.m.s. (over the pulse) of the quantity |x HOM out - x s.s. out |/x out . In E-linac, the steady state deflections (s.s.) turn out to be small. Dipole HOMs (CST Microwave Studio) The blue points have a larger chance to fall in the vicinity of a green line than red. 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 f, GHz RdQ red: f b 650 MHz green: f b 100 MHz The 26 R/Q values shown on both the 650-MHz mesh (red) and the more dense 100-MHz mesh (green). Sample tracking-pulse shape at linac exit orbit pattern for a single random seed HOM action only (green); mode frequency spread of 0.1 MHz (black); both frequency spread 0.1 MHz and 5 % charge jitter (red) RMS bunch orbit offsets The Figure shows the rms orbit growth calculated from 20 random machines (10 frequency seeds com- bined with 10 seeds of random charge jitter): average (top) and maximum (bottom). 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.010 0.020 0.050 0.100 I,mA rms orbit offset at exit relative Average of 20 seeds fission, with abs. highbr., with abs. fission, wo absorber highbr., wo absorber 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.100 0.500 1.000 I,mA rms orbit offset at exit relative Max of 20 seeds fission, with abs. highbr., with abs. fission, wo absorber highbr., wo absorber rms bunch orbit offsets depending on the average current for 20 random machines Conclusions The high-brightness beam is more affected by BBU (higher bunch charge and a larger chance for a HOM to get near a machine line). The emittance dilution is negligible for a cavity with absorbers for both fission and high-brightness beam. The initial E-linac operation at 10 mA is practi- cally not affected. References [1] L. Merminga, et al, ARIEL: TRIUMF’s Advanced Rare IsotopE Laboratory, these proceedings. [2] E.E. Chambers, Particle Motion in a Standing Wave Linear Accelerator, SLAC report 1967 [3] Schuh, M.; Tckmantel, J.; Biarrotte, J. L.; Kaltchev, D., Code Benchmarking of Higher Order Modes Simulation Codes , CERN-sLHC-Project-Note-0010 - Geneva : CERN, 201 [4] TESLA Technical Design Report, Part 2: The Accelerator, DESY, March 2001. [5] R.L. Gluckstern, R.K. Cooper and P.J. Channell, Cumulative Beam Breakup in RF Linacs, Part Acc, vol 16 pp 125-153. [6] CST PARTICLE STUDIO, www.cst.com [7] D. Jeon , L. Merminga , G. Krafft , B. Yunn, R. Sundelin, J. Delayen, S. Kim, M. Doleans, Cumulative beam break-up study of the spallation neutron source superconducting linac, NIM A 495 (2002) 85-94. [8] Klaus Flttmann, ASTRA, http://www.desy.de/ ˜ mpyflo [9] J. Tckmantel, Beam simulations with initial bunch noise in superconducting rf proton linacs, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 011001 (2010)