DO FISH LOCKS HAVE POTENTIAL IN TROPICAL RIVERS? IVOR G. STUART, a * ANDREW P. BERGHUIS, b PETER E. LONG a and MARTIN MALLEN-COOPER c a Queensland Fisheries Service, Post Office Box 6014, Rockhampton, Queensland 4700, Australia b Queensland Fisheries Service, Post Office Box 1143, Bundaberg, Queensland 4670, Australia c Fishway Consulting Services, 8 Tudor Place, St Ives Chase, NSW 2075, Australia ABSTRACT This study evaluated attraction and passage of native fish through an automated fish lock on the tropical Fitzroy River in north-eastern Australia. In 69 samples (24 h each) taken at the exit and entrance of the fish lock, 17 fish species and 13 402 individuals were collected, at a maximum rate of 3317 fish per day. During low river flows, the fish lock transferred a broad size range of fish (35–710 mm long), though migratory biomass was small. Removal of a vertical fish-crowding device did not affect the passage rate. Netting studies and observations of fish migrating below the weir suggested that the entrance was poorly located during high flows and another fishway near the spillway would enhance fish passage. The fish lock was inoperative for 48% of the time, due to mechanical and software failure, and a narrow operational range unsuited to the variable hydrology. Nevertheless, these design issues are site specific and reflect that fish lock technology is in its infancy in Australia. The operational reliability of the fish lock is now greatly improved but further work is needed to optimize the automatic cycling. To accommodate the inherently variable hydrology of lowland tropical/sub-tropical rivers into fishway design, we highlight important research needs for fishways and migratory fish communities. Fish locks are often considered a less favourable fish passage option but with the operational reliability issues partially resolved, they appear to have considerable potential for tropical river systems with low minimum flows and low biomass; with further research and design, they may have wider application. Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. key words: Australia; Queensland; fish passage; fishway; migration; potamodromous; Fitzroy River; Eden Bann Weir Received 1 February 2006; Revised 16 July 2006; Accepted 2 August 2006 INTRODUCTION In the USA, Europe, Ireland, Russia and South America fish locks, lifts and trap and transport systems have been used to improve fish passage at medium (>7 m high) and high barriers (>15m high; Pavlov, 1989; Clay, 1995; Lucas and Baras, 2001; Oldani and Baigun, 2002). Most high fish passage systems only target a few important commercial species and, in contrast to tropical fishes, these usually have a well-defined migration season (Clay, 1995; Lucas and Baras, 2001). Fish locks have often been unsuccessful, mainly due to their limited capacity to pass a large biomass and because some fish fail to enter and exit. In France, for these reasons, fish locks are rarely considered when constructing fish passage facilities (Larinier et al., 2002). Presently, there are eight fish locks in Australia with six of these on barriers up to 15 m high in the tropical/ sub-tropical coastal rivers of the north-east. The design and operation of Australian fish locks has largely been based on overseas specifications, although maximum water velocities and turbulence have been reduced to allow for the swimming abilities of native fish (Mallen-Cooper, 1992; Stuart and Berghuis, 2002). To date, few studies have assessed the effectiveness of fish locks, particularly for passing the diverse and abundant fish communities present in large tropical river systems. In northern Australia, tropical rivers are characterized by long periods of zero flow during the dry season (May to October), where even large rivers may contract to waterholes, followed by less predictable but intense summer and RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS River Res. Applic. 23: 269–286 (2007) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/rra.979 *Correspondence to: Ivor G. Stuart, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Post Office Box 137, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia. E-mail: Ivor.Stuart@dse.vic.gov.au Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.