Yuk Hui On the Unhappy Consciousness of Neoreactionaries 1. Decline of the Occident Again? In his contribution to the 2004 conference Politics and Apocalypse, dedicated to the French theorist and anthropologist Rne Girard, Peter Thiel wrote that 9/11 marked the failure of the Enlightenment heritage. The West needed a new political theory to save itself from a new world configuration open to a global terrorism that operated outside of all the norms of the liberal West. 1 Granting in advance that the West had embodied the doctrines and values of democracy and equality, Thiel moved immediately to argue that these had made the West vulnerable. Such assertions of the Enlightenments obsolescence characterize the principal attitude of neoreaction, of which Mencius Moldbug — the pen name of Silicon Valley computer scientist and startup entrepreneur Curtis Yarvin — and the British philosopher Nick Land are the primary representatives. If Thiel is the king, then they are his knights, defending certain communities surrounding Reddit and 4Chan. Nor are the three unrelated. Over the past decade Moldbugs blog, Unqualified Reservations, has inspired Lands writing, and his startup company Tlon is supported by Thiel, a well-known venture capitalist, founder of PayPal and Palantir, and member of Donald Trumps transition team. Tlons primary product, Urbit, proposes a new protocol different from the centralized client- server structure that currently dominates contemporary networks, allowing decentralization based on personal cloud computing — a so-called post-singularity operating system. The task of neoreaction seems to be sufficiently summarized in the question raised by Thiel towards the end of his paper: The modern West has lost faith in itself. In the Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment period, this loss of faith liberated enormous commercial and creative forces. At the same time, this loss has rendered the West vulnerable. Is there a way to fortify the modern West without destroying it altogether, a way of not throwing the baby out with the bathwater? 2 I think Thiels question exemplifies a condition Hegel once diagnosed as the unhappy consciousness; understanding this concept is helpful for understanding neoreaction. 3 Since history is, for Hegel, a long chain of necessary movements of the Spirit on the way to absolute self-consciousness, there are many stops or stations along the way — for example from Judaism to Christianity, and so on. The unhappy consciousness is the tragic moment when consciousness recognizes a contradiction at the e-flux journal #81 april 2017 Yuk Hui On the Unhappy Consciousness of Neoreactionaries 01/12 04.06.17 / 12:03:45 EDT