Electrophoresis of Protein Charge Ladders: A Comparison of Experiment with Various
Continuum Primitive Models
Stuart A. Allison,*
,²
Jeffrey D. Carbeck,
‡
Chuanying Chen,
²,§
and Felicia Burkes
²
Department of Chemistry, Georgia State UniVersity, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, and Department of Chemical
Engineering, Princeton UniVersity, Room A319, E-Quad, Princeton, New Jersey 08540
ReceiVed: October 31, 2003; In Final Form: January 19, 2004
Detailed modeling of the free solution electrophoresis of five proteins (bovine R-lactalbumin, hen egg white
lysozyme, bovine superoxide dismutase, human carbonic anhydrase II, and hen ovalbumin) is carried out
within the framework of the continuum primitive model. Protein crystal structures and translational diffusion
constants are used to design and parametrize the models. The modeling results are compared with experimental
mobilities of protein charge ladders, collections of protein derivatives where the number of charge groups is
varied by partial acylation of lysine residues or by amidation of glutamic and aspartic acid residues. The
simplest model considered is the Yoon and Kim model of a prolate/oblate ellipsoid with uniform surface
potential, electrostatics treated at the level of the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation, and distortion of the
ion atmosphere from equilibrium (ion relaxation) ignored (Yoon, B. J.; Kim, S. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
1989, 128, 275). This model provides good agreement with experiment but only if the net absolute protein
charge is low or the average absolute surface, or , potential is less than ∼25 mV. Boundary element (BE)
modeling is also carried out in which detailed surface models are employed and the electrostatics are solved
at the level of the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Ion relaxation is also included in some of the BE
studies. All of the experimental mobilities are in good (human carbonic anhydrase II and hen ovalbumin) to
excellent (bovine R-lactalbumin, hen egg white lysozyme, and bovine superoxide dismutase) agreement with
BE modeling that includes ion relaxation. We believe that these results taken as a whole serve to confirm the
ability of the continuum primitive model to predict, with quantitative accuracy, the free solution electrophoretic
mobilities of proteins, provided the underlying models are sufficiently realistic. When a discrepancy occurs,
it may be due to error in modeling either the protein charge or the solution conformation. The models described
in this work also provide a useful approach for determining values of ΔZ, the change in net charge of proteins
due to the chemical modification of charged groups. Knowledge of ΔZ is essential for the use of protein
charge ladders in the quantitative description of the electrostatic properties and interactions of proteins. This
paper supports the view that the continuum primitive model may be more appropriate for the modeling of
electrokinetics than for electrostatics. The main challenge to the accurate predictions of electrophoretic mobilities
may lie primarily in the modeling of electrostatics, not electrokinetics.
I. Introduction
The prediction of electrophoretic mobilities of proteins from
their sequences and structures is challenging because such
predictions require accurate models of both the electrostatic and
the electrokinetic properties of proteins. Electrostatic models
are used to predict the distribution of charges on the protein
due to the reversible binding of protons to ionizable groups and
also the electrostatic potential in the vicinity of the model
protein. Electrokinetic models take as input a particular distribu-
tion of charge and electrostatic potential and predict the
electrophoretic mobility. Both types of models are generally
based on the continuum primitive model. The combination of
capillary electrophoresis (CE) and protein charge ladders is a
useful experimental system for addressing this challenge, as it
provides values of electrophoretic mobilities for a collection of
protein derivatives that differ incrementally in the number of
ionizable groups. In the prediction of electrophoretic mobilities
of protein charge ladders, most of the effort has been devoted
to modeling of the electrostatics; only simple models of the
electrokinetics have been applied. The objective of this paper
is to compare experimental mobilities with several electrokinetic
models and to determine the degree to which these models can
accurately predict the electrophoretic mobilities of proteins.
The combination of CE and charge ladders has been used
for the characterization of a variety of physical properties and
interactions of proteins: examples include their net charges,
1
hydrodynamic sizes,
2
molecular weights,
3
dissociation of titrat-
able groups,
4,5
and stabilities.
6
Charge ladders are produced by
the partial and chemical modification of charged groups on the
protein. The most common procedures involve the acylation of
lysine residues with acetic anhydride
3
or the conversion of
aspartic and glutamic acid residues to hydroxamic groups
(amidation) with hydroxylamine.
7
In free solution capillary
electrophoresis, these modified proteins separate into distinct
bands, or “rungs”, in which each rung consists of species with
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: (404)651-1986.
E-mail: chesaa@panther.gsu.edu.
²
Georgia State University.
‡
Princeton University.
§
Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Houston,
Houston, TX 77004.
4516 J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 4516-4524
10.1021/jp0312215 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/13/2004