The Geological Society of America Special Paper 430 2007 Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region Michele Lustrino* Eugenio Carminati Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy, and Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria (IGAG) CNR, c/o Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, Italy ABSTRACT Anorogenic magmatism of the circum-Mediterranean area (the Tyrrhenian Sea, Sardinia, Sicily Channel, and the Middle East) and of continental Europe (the French Massif Central, Eifel, the Bohemian Massif, and the Pannonian basin) has been pro- posed to be related to the presence of one or more mantle plumes. Such conclusions based on geochemical data and seismic tomography are not fully justified because (1) a given chemical and isotopic composition of a magma can be explained by different petrogenetic models, (2) a given petrogenetic process can produce magmas with dif- ferent chemical and isotopic composition, (3) tomographic studies do not furnish unique results (i.e., different models give different results), and (4) the commonly adopted interpretation of seismic wave velocity anomalies exclusively in terms of temperature is not unique; velocities are also dependent on other parameters, such as composition, melting, anisotropy, and anelasticity. Tomography and geochemistry are powerful tools but must be used in an interdisciplinary way, in combination with ge- odynamics and structural geology. Alone they cannot provide conclusive evidence for or against the existence of mantle plumes. The existence of large and/or extensive thermal anomalies under Europe is here considered unnecessary, because other models, based on the existence of upper-mantle heterogeneity, can explain the major-element, trace-element, and isotopic variability of the magmas. Volcanism in central Europe (the French Massif Central, Germany, and the Bohemian Massif) is concentrated in Cenozoic rifted areas and is here inter- preted as the result of passive asthenosphere upwelling driven by decompression. Sim- ilarly, anorogenic magmatism in Sardinia, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Pannonian basin is explained as the result of lithospheric stretching in a back-arc geodynamic set- ting. The most important factors determining the locus and, in part, the geochemical characteristics of magmatic activity are the Moho and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary depths. Where both are shallowed by tectonic processes (e.g., in rift zones or back-arc basins), passive upwelling of asthenospheric mantle can explain the mag- matic activity. Keywords: petrology, geodynamics, mantle plume, lithosphere, Mediterranean 723 *E-mail: michele.lustrino@uniroma1.it. Lustrino, M., and Carminati, E., 2007, Phantom plumes in Europe and the circum-Mediterranean region, in Foulger, G.R., and Jurdy, D.M., eds., Plates, plumes, and planetary processes: Geological Society of America Special Paper 430, p. 723–745, doi: 10.1130/2007.2430(33). For permission to copy, contact editing@geosociety.org. ©2007 The Geological Society of America. All rights reserved.