Evaluating the impact of urban green space and landscape design
parameters on thermal comfort in hot summer by numerical
simulation
Shibo Sun
a, 1
, Xiyan Xu
b, c, *, 1
, Zhaoming Lao
d
, Wei Liu
a
, Zhandong Li
a
,
Ester Higueras García
e
, Li He
b
, Jianning Zhu
a, **
a
College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
b
School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
c
Faculty of Science, University Autonoma of Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
d
Zhongshan Meteorological Service, Zhongshan 528400, China
e
Escuela T ecnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Polit ecnica de Madrid-UPM, Madrid 28040, Spain
article info
Article history:
Received 25 April 2017
Received in revised form
6 July 2017
Accepted 7 July 2017
Available online 8 July 2017
Keywords:
Green space
Thermal comfort
ENVI-met
Landscape design
Landscape parameters
Vegetation
Beijing
abstract
Urban green spaces (UGS) can help to moderate the urban heat island effect and thus thermal comfort
through the impact of landscape design parameters with regard to the land cover features. The current
work investigates the thermal comfort modification potential of a long belt-shaped park (around 9 km)
in Beijing and the effects of its landscape parameters using numerical simulation. Holistic spatial and
temporal distribution scenarios of thermal comfort of the park are obtained in terms of physiological
equivalent temperature (PET). The UGS covered regions generally exhibit better thermal comfort level,
but deteriorating phenomenon is also found at some uncovered sites in the park due to the solar-
radiation and enhanced reflection effect. At 14:00 h, the mean reduced PET (△PET
m
) by UGS are
around 2
C with the maximum and minimum value being 15.6
C and 8.4
C, respectively. Regression
analyses show that the most significant influential factor on the moderation of thermal comfort is the
higher trees, while the hardened ground exhibits a negative effect. The outcome of the current work
provides detailed knowledge on the benefits of UGS and gives suggestions for urban landscape planners
and policy makers to improve urban thermal comfort.
© 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction
Rapid urbanization brings not only convenient modern lifestyles
in terms of functional centralization, but also continuous deterio-
ration of urban environment such as the urban heat island (UHI)
effect which can reduce the urban thermal comfort [1]. Increasing
the percentage of urban green space (UGS) and a better arrange-
ment of the landscape parameters can ease this concern effectively,
as argued by scholars during the last decade [2]. Those landscape
parameters include vegetation, water body, hardened ground
(walking path and plaza) and building (shading devices and other
buildings). The vegetation components of the UGS like lawn and
trees allow cooling effect by transpiration process through vapor-
ization of the water discharged from the leaves [3e5]. Apart from
that, trees can also provide a cool shading area below the canopy by
interrupting the direct solar-radiation, so that the thermal comfort
sensation can be improved in both the covered region and adjacent
surroundings [6e12]. Masmoudi et al. [7] reported that the pres-
ence and orientation of the vegetable masses are fairly significant
parameters impacting the surrounding microclimate. Perini et al.
[13] investigated the cooling effect of vegetation where a difference
was found with respect to the amount of green area and vegetation
types. They also found that vegetation was more effective in the
microclimate with higher temperatures and lower relative hu-
midity (RH) values. Specific study revealed that the transmissivity
of total and direct solar radiation through crown of street trees
could be significantly reduced within the foliated area [14]. Very
recently, Morakinyo et al. [4] studied the thermal comfort
* Corresponding author. School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power
University, Beijing 102206, China.
** Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: yorkxxu@gmail.com (X. Xu), blzjn@vip.sina.com (J. Zhu).
1
Author contributions: These authors contributed equally.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Building and Environment
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.010
0360-1323/© 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Building and Environment 123 (2017) 277e288