geographical record  The Geographical Review  (): , April  Copyright ©  by the American Geographical Society of New York * Our thanks to everyone on the team who worked on the environmental audit of Sant Sadurní d’Anoia. Likewise, many thanks to Isidor Rando, environmental counselor of Sant Sadurní d’Anoia during the audit process, for his eorts in fostering relations with the urban planning team. We would also like to thank Craig Colten for his suggestions and for reading earlier versions of this essay. Dra. Alió is a professor of geography at the University of Barcelona,  Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; [alio@ub.edu]. Dra. Fracasso is a professor of geography at the Academy of Fine Arts of Foggia,  Foggia, Italy; [liliana.fracasso@abafg.it]. Ms. Estrella is an independent scholar in urban envi- ronmental planning in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; [sandraestrella@hotmail.com]. GEOGRAPHICAL RECORD ECOPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL REFORM IN A METROPOLITAN FRINGE: SANT SADURNÍ D’ANOIA, CATALONIA* MARIA ÀNGELS ALIÓ, LILIANA FRACASSO, and SANDRA ESTRELLA Urban planners normally consider a territory, be it a town, city, or region, as merely a physical location for economic growth and urban expansion. Yet the tension between expectations in terms of quality of life linked to the enlargement of urban systems, on one hand, and the degradation of natural resources, on the other, has put the spotlight on the relationships between environmental and human systems within the framework of contemporary social processes. The recognition of the coevolutionary dynamic involving society and environment represents a great responsibility for urban planners and has led them to propose new and necessarily more complex tools. It is also a great responsibility for geographers, especially since the emergence of the concept of sustainability in public policies, which has led to a thorough reappraisal of the relationships between nature and society. In the late s Robert Kates emphasized the implications of the concept of sustainability as a new theoretical framework that was beginning to establish itself (, ). Other geographers soon began to work on the subject. In the mid- s Karl Zimmerer referred to a new ecological human geography that investi- gated the social and economic interconnections between local and extralocal spatial scales in order to understand environmental impacts (, ). At the same time, in Europe Torsten Hägerstrand researched the impact of construction and the possibilities of building along ecological lines and using natural raw materials (Díaz Muñoz ). Attempts to analyze the relationships between modern tech- nological societies and the environmental problems they generated characterized the s. Studies also focused on the ability of public policies to resolve these problems and to introduce changes favoring models of sustainability, including criteria for prevention (O’Riordan and Jordan ). A more critical vision, one that emphasized the role of social inequality in environmental policies, emerged alongside this growing interest. In  Raymond L. Bryant discussed the possibil- ity of applying political ecology as a framework for research on environmental