Spinal nerve segmentation in higher vertebrates: axon
guidance by repulsion and attraction
Roger J. Keynes, Alan R. Johnson, Adrian Pini*, David Tannahill and
Geoffrey M.W. Cook
The development of spinal nerve segmentation in higher
vertebrate embryos provides a convenient experimental system
for the analysis of axon guidance mechanisms. We review
evidence from chick embryo experiments that segmentation of
motor and sensory axons results from a combination of
contact repulsion of axon growth cones by posterior somite
cells and chemoattraction of growth cones by anterior cells.
We also review progress in identifying the underlying
molecular mechanisms in this system, and suggest a
prominent role for carbohydrate groups in mediating growth
con e repu lsion .
Key words: axon guidance / contact repulsion /
glycoconjugate / segmentation / somite
©1996 Academic Press Ltd
AS INCREASING NUMBERS of candidate axon guidance
molecules are identified, the need remains for experi-
mentally convenient, anatomically simple model sys-
tems with which to evaluate their function in vivo . This
need is enhanced, moreover, by the realization that
axon growth cones are probably guided by a variety of
influences, both attractive and repulsive, operating
locally at the cell surface and over longer distances by
diffusing within the extracellular matrix [see ref 1 for
review]. One promising in-vivo system concerns the
development of spinal nerve segmentation in higher
vertebrate embryos. In this article we review progress
in identifying the mechanisms and candidate mole-
cules involved. We argue that the simultaneous
operation of contact repulsion/ inhibition and chem-
oattraction are required to explain the full pattern of
axon outgrowth in the axial-trunk region of the
embryo. We also suggest a prominent role for
carbohydrate moieties in mediating repulsion.
Spinal nerve segmentation
We originally observed that spinal motor and sensory
axons are confined to the anterior (A, rostral) half of
each somite-derived sclerotome during their lateral
outgrowth from the chick spinal cord region, avoiding
posterior (P) half-sclerotome even after its surgical
displacement in ovo .
2
This restriction, which also
applies to migrating trunk neural crest cells,
3
ensures
that the spinal nerves eventually acquire the correct
anatomical relationship with the flexible vertebral
column. In principle it could result from attractive
influences in the anterior half-somite and/ or repul-
sive influences in the posterior half-somite.
2
The latter
possibility is strengthened by the finding that somite
detergent extracts, incorporated into liposomes,
induce reversible collapse of sensory axon growth
cones extending on a laminin substrate in vitro . We
envisage that somite-derived proteins present in the
liposomes trigger collapse by interaction with appro-
priate growth cone receptors.
4
Consistent with the
repulsion hypothesis, chick motor axon growth cones
also avoid posterior sclerotome cells in vitro by turning
or branching after filopodial contact.
5
A means of identifying candidate repulsion mole-
cules was suggested by the observation that peanut
agglutinin (PNA, a lectin with specificity for Gal 1–3
GalNAc residues, see below) binds to posterior half-
sclerotome cells but not to those of the anterior half.
6
Using PNA-affinity chromatography we isolated a
PNA-binding glycoprotein fraction from chick
somites, and identified two major components
(M
r
48,000 and 55,000) on one-dimensional SDS
PAGE separations that are absent from anterior half-
sclerotomes but present in posterior halves. Poly-
clonal antibodies raised against these components
were used to immunodeplete all the growth cone
collapse-inducing activity in somite detergent extracts,
and were found to stain only the posterior half-
sclerotomes in tissue sections.
4
We hypothesize that
expression of this material in the posterior half-
From the Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge,
Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY and *Department of Genetics
and Biometry, University College London, Wolfson House, 4
Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK
seminars in THE NEUROSCIENCES, Vol 8, 1996: pp 339–345
©1996 Academic Press Ltd
1044-5765/96/060339 + 07 $25.00/0
339