International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 03 Issue: 08 | Aug-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2016, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 4.45 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1461
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF TALL BUILDINGS WITH AND WITHOUT
BRACINGS AND STRUTS
P.Pramod Kumar Reddy
1
, Prof..H.Sudarsana Rao
2
1
PG Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering JNTUA, Anantapur.
2
Professor & Director ICS, JNT University, Ananthapur,
Abstract - As the population is increasing and available
space is less, world is looking to make tall buildings to
accommodate more people within available area. Due to
this, tall buildings passion started. Due to movement of
tectonic plates Indian land is divided into zones which
represent the seismic ranges. These zones are reduced to
four from five. This indicates the closeness of earthquake
causing effects. If we come across the design of existing
buildings we can find the lack of seismic resisting capacity.
For impeccable performance of buildings we have to do
the seismic analysis. Seismic analysis is performed on
Three models namely DzG+ͷͺ Normal Buildingdz as Model ͷ,
DzG+ͷͺ Building with Bracingsdz as Model , DzG+ͷͺ Building
with Single Strutsdz as Model using Equivalent static
method, Response Spectrum Method and Time History
Analysis. The Buildings are assumed to be located in Zone
II and Zone III resting on Hard soil. From the static and
dynamic analysis we can compare the three models for
seismic parameters like Base shear, Storey Shears, Storey
drift and Time period. For this comparison ETABS
software package is used for modeling the Building Models
by following the IS:1893(Part I)-2002.
Key Words – Bracings, Base Shear, Equivalent static
method, Response spectrum method, Storey Shear,
Single Strut, Time history analysis, Time Period.
1 INTRODUCTION
The composite reinforced (RC) frame buildings
are becoming most preferable for Earthquake Resistant
Buildings. The composite materials that are used in
composite RC frame buildings are Bracings, Struts, Shear
walls, etc. These Composite RC frame buildings shows
great stiffness and strength than normal RC frame
buildings. Due to these advantages the composite
structures are capable of resisting Earthquake effects. In
order to study this composite nature of buildings,
Bracings and struts are considered. In order to resist the
earthquake loads the external loads are to be carried to
the foundation in a most effective way without any
interruption. These composite materials are installed in
between the columns of the building in a diagonal
manner. As the weight of the building is increased, the
stiffness also increases automatically. By this increase in
stiffness the strength of the building also increases, which
gives the resistant towards the compression and tension
values.
From these facts this study is carried over by
taking three models, the first model is DzG+1Ͷ Normal RC
frame buildingdz, the second one is DzG+1Ͷ RC frame
building with Bracingsdz, the third one DzG+1Ͷ RC frame
building with strutsdz. Using ETABS software seismic
analysis is carried out on these three models in four
zones as per IS: 1893(part I)-2002 using Static analysis
and Dynamic analysis.
Seismic Coefficient method also known as
Equivalent static analysis is used as a static analysis and
the response spectrum method is used to perform the
dynamic analysis. A linear dynamic analysis namely time
history analysis is used to apply the ground motions
recorded during uttarakasi earthquake which occurred in