The Pain Distress Inventory: Development and Initial Psychometric Properties Augustine Osman and Francisco X. Barrios University of Northern Iowa Peter M. Gutierrez Northern Illinois University Beverly A. Kopper and Adam Butler University of Northern Iowa Courtney L. Bagge University of Missouri–Columbia A new 26-item self-report measure, the Pain Distress Inventory (PDI), was designed to assess affective distress symptoms related to physical pain. Phases 1 to 3 were designed to construct the PDI using contemporary test development strategies. Studies 1 and 2 were conducted to define and confirm the four-factor oblique structure of the PDI: PDI-Depression, PDI-Anger, PDI-Pain Sensitivity, and PDI-Somatic Anxiety. The internal con- sistency reliability estimates were high for both the PDI total and scale scores. Study 3 examined relationships of the PDI with demographic vari- ables and pain- and psychological-related responses. Scores on the PDI were useful in predicting scores on a pain-interference index and a pain- symptom index. Study 4 was designed to replicate previous findings of reliability and validity. The PDI total and scale scores were useful in differ- entiating between the responses of the clinic and nonclinic study partici- pants. Limitations and potential uses of the PDI are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 59: 767–785, 2003. Keywords: Pain Distress Inventory; psychological responses; reliability; validity Portions of these investigations were presented at the 22nd (2001) annual scientific meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM), Seattle, WA. This work was supported by a Publication Grant from the Graduate College of the University of Northern Iowa. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Augustine Osman, 334 Baker Hall, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614–0505; e-mail: augustine.osman@uni.edu. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 59(7), 767–785 (2003) © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10173