Humanities and Social Sciences Review, CD-ROM. ISSN: 2165-6258 :: 1(4):187–200 (2012) Copyright c 2012 by UniversityPublications.net THE IMPACT OF (MIS) ANCHORING IN CREATING A DIFFERENCE IN/DIFFERENT MEANING(S) Yasser K. R. Aman Minia University, Egypt. (Mis)anchoring is based on the claim that there may be a difference between the intention (stimulus) of the speaker/writer and that of the listener/reader. Both may refer to the same thing/concept but each reference retains a distinct situational meaning (response). Such a difference creates a double meaning which perceived by the reader who, in a way or another, builds up his own interpretation blended from both intentions he reads, or from the one intention that strikes a chord in him or finds an immediate anchor in his memory. As for the listener, his response, whether it is a state of anchoring or misanchoring, depends upon what his memory prioritizes as the best fit for the situation. Accordingly, incidents of everyday life, a movie or of a literary work may take an unexpected turn which produces different interpretation than the one intended. Taking NLP anchoring as a starting point prepares for and later creates a paradigm for measuring the richness and profitability of memories on which mis/anchoring is based. By discussing different literary works, movies and daily life events, using mis/anchoring as a reading mechanism, one concludes that a difference in/different meaning(s) can be crystallized in order to reach a better understanding of works under analysis. Keywords: NLP anchoring, Situational (mis)anchoring, Misunderstanding, Literary works, Movies. Introduction NLP Anchoring and Accidental/Situational Mis/Anchoring NLP anchoring can simply be diagramed as follows: Stimulus memory recall anchoring state change. Accidental/situational anchoring can similarly be diagramed: Stimulus memory recall mis/anchoring state change. The meaning of many works is reinforced, developed and interpreted by (mis)anchoring which associates a strong mental or emotional state to a stimulus. Intuitive judgment is part of the anchoring process and the context plays an important role in making the meaning clear. Depending on the context, the word BANK will be interpreted as referring to money or to a river but not simultaneously to both, and the ambiguity is likely to be 187