Neurobiology of Aging 24 (2003) 969–976 Immune responses against A1–42 in HLA class II transgenic mice: implications for A1–42 immune-mediated therapies Pritam Das a,1 , Svetlana Chapoval b,1 , Victor Howard a , Chella S. David b , Todd E. Golde a, a Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA b Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA Received 4 October 2002; received in revised form 6 January 2003; accepted 3 February 2003 Abstract We have investigated whether polymorphic differences in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules influence humoral and cellular immune responses against A1–42. To analyze the effects of mouse MHC class II and tolerance effects of overexpres- sion of human APP in mice, we immunized Tg2576 and non-transgenic littermates bred into two different MHC backgrounds with A1–42 and compared both B and T cell responses. We found that in the presence of the mouse C57BL/6 background, both B and T cell responses against A1–42 were significantly suppressed. To directly test the contribution of human MHC class II, we immunized various human HLA class II transgenic (TG) mice with A1–42 and analyzed anti-Aimmune responses. HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 TG mice generated modest B and T cell responses against A1–42. The presence of HLA-DR3/DQ8 in double TG mice enhanced the overall immune response against A1–42. In contrast, HLA-DR4 TG mice mounted strong T cell responses but failed to generate high titer antibody responses against A1–42, whereas, the HLA-DQ6 TG mice were not able to mount significant B or T cell responses against A1–42. These studies in mice suggest that the presence of certain MHC class II molecules or combinations of class II molecules can potentially influence the overall immune response against A1–42. © 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Avaccination; A1–42; Tg2576 mice; Alzheimer’s disease; MHC class II 1. Introduction Amyloid beta peptides (A) appear to play a causal role in the neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [14,27,29]. Work by Schenk et al. [26] has shifted attention to the ther- apeutic potential of increasing Aclearance by inducing a robust humoral immune response to Ain the PDAPP trans- genic (TG) mouse model of AD [12]. Using fibrillar A1–42 as an immunogen, they found that in animals, which de- veloped a high anti-Aantibody titer, there was a signif- icant reduction in biochemically detected Aload, plaque burden, neuritic dystrophy and gliosis. Significantly, this study not only showed that Aimmunization prevented A deposition in young PDAPP mice, but also attenuated A deposition in mice that were not immunized until they had developed Adeposits. These studies have now been ex- tended to other models and strategies [2,4,9–11,18–20,22]. Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-904-953-1086; fax: +1-904-953-7370. E-mail address: golde.todd@mayo.edu (T.E. Golde). 1 These authors contributed equally. Passive transfer of anti-A-specific antibodies [4] or direct application of A-specific antibodies to the brain [2] were shown to reduce amyloid burden in the APP TG mice, pro- viding strong evidence that the efficacy of Aimmunization could be attributed directly to the production of anti-Aan- tibodies. Both active immunization of A1–42 [11,18,22] and passive transfer of A-specific antibodies [19] in APP TG mice have now been shown to prevent and/or reverse cognitive deficits in these mice without significantly alter- ing Aplaque loads. The overall hypothesis in these stud- ies is that Aantibodies enter the CNS, bind and neutralize soluble Athat may be affecting cognitive function. This hypothesis differs from the one suggested in the report by DeMattos et al. [10] where they show that anti-Aantibod- ies can induce Aaccumulation in plasma and alter brain levels of A. In this later report, it is suggested that anti-A antibodies acts outside the CNS, by creating a peripheral sink that draws Aout of the brain. In any case, irrespec- tive of the mechanisms, in order for direct Aimmuniza- tion to be efficacious in humans, the generation of robust anti-A1–42 humoral responses appear to be prerequisite. 0197-4580/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00036-8