Neurobiology of Aging 24 (2003) 969–976
Immune responses against A1–42 in HLA class II transgenic mice:
implications for A1–42 immune-mediated therapies
Pritam Das
a,1
, Svetlana Chapoval
b,1
, Victor Howard
a
,
Chella S. David
b
, Todd E. Golde
a,∗
a
Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
b
Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Received 4 October 2002; received in revised form 6 January 2003; accepted 3 February 2003
Abstract
We have investigated whether polymorphic differences in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules influence
humoral and cellular immune responses against A1–42. To analyze the effects of mouse MHC class II and tolerance effects of overexpres-
sion of human APP in mice, we immunized Tg2576 and non-transgenic littermates bred into two different MHC backgrounds with A1–42
and compared both B and T cell responses. We found that in the presence of the mouse C57BL/6 background, both B and T cell responses
against A1–42 were significantly suppressed. To directly test the contribution of human MHC class II, we immunized various human
HLA class II transgenic (TG) mice with A1–42 and analyzed anti-A immune responses. HLA-DR3 and HLA-DQ8 TG mice generated
modest B and T cell responses against A1–42. The presence of HLA-DR3/DQ8 in double TG mice enhanced the overall immune response
against A1–42. In contrast, HLA-DR4 TG mice mounted strong T cell responses but failed to generate high titer antibody responses
against A1–42, whereas, the HLA-DQ6 TG mice were not able to mount significant B or T cell responses against A1–42. These studies
in mice suggest that the presence of certain MHC class II molecules or combinations of class II molecules can potentially influence the
overall immune response against A1–42.
© 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A vaccination; A1–42; Tg2576 mice; Alzheimer’s disease; MHC class II
1. Introduction
Amyloid beta peptides (A) appear to play a causal role in
the neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [14,27,29].
Work by Schenk et al. [26] has shifted attention to the ther-
apeutic potential of increasing A clearance by inducing a
robust humoral immune response to A in the PDAPP trans-
genic (TG) mouse model of AD [12]. Using fibrillar A1–42
as an immunogen, they found that in animals, which de-
veloped a high anti-A antibody titer, there was a signif-
icant reduction in biochemically detected A load, plaque
burden, neuritic dystrophy and gliosis. Significantly, this
study not only showed that A immunization prevented A
deposition in young PDAPP mice, but also attenuated A
deposition in mice that were not immunized until they had
developed A deposits. These studies have now been ex-
tended to other models and strategies [2,4,9–11,18–20,22].
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-904-953-1086; fax: +1-904-953-7370.
E-mail address: golde.todd@mayo.edu (T.E. Golde).
1
These authors contributed equally.
Passive transfer of anti-A-specific antibodies [4] or direct
application of A-specific antibodies to the brain [2] were
shown to reduce amyloid burden in the APP TG mice, pro-
viding strong evidence that the efficacy of A immunization
could be attributed directly to the production of anti-A an-
tibodies. Both active immunization of A1–42 [11,18,22]
and passive transfer of A-specific antibodies [19] in APP
TG mice have now been shown to prevent and/or reverse
cognitive deficits in these mice without significantly alter-
ing A plaque loads. The overall hypothesis in these stud-
ies is that A antibodies enter the CNS, bind and neutralize
soluble A that may be affecting cognitive function. This
hypothesis differs from the one suggested in the report by
DeMattos et al. [10] where they show that anti-A antibod-
ies can induce A accumulation in plasma and alter brain
levels of A. In this later report, it is suggested that anti-A
antibodies acts outside the CNS, by creating a peripheral
sink that draws A out of the brain. In any case, irrespec-
tive of the mechanisms, in order for direct A immuniza-
tion to be efficacious in humans, the generation of robust
anti-A1–42 humoral responses appear to be prerequisite.
0197-4580/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00036-8