EMPEDOCLES B 96 (462 BOLLACK) AND THE POETRY OF ADHESION BY DAVID SIDER Arist. de An. 410a4 (vv. 1-3)1) Alexander Aphrod. Meta. 135.15 (1-3), 828.8 (2-3) (cited when the two passages disagree as Alex.a and Alex.b respectively) Themistius deAn. 33.12 (1-3) Syrianus Meta. 188.17 (2-3) Asclepius Trall. Meta. 112.1 (1-3) Philoponus de An. 176.25 (1-3) Simplicius Phys. 300.21 (1-4) Simplicius deAn. 68.3 (paraphrase) Sophonias de An. 32.15 (1-3) 1 Alex.A Simpl.Phys.EFWa Arist. Alex.LF Them. Asclep. Philop. Simpl.Phys.D Simpl.deAn. Sophon. 2 Arist.WP Alex. Syr. Simpl.Phys.DE Arist.UVX Asclep. Philop.DR Them.C Sophon. Arist. Them.Z Philop.t Simpl.Phys.FWa Steinhart (approb. Diels-Kranz) Arist.VW Alex.bA Them.Z Philop. Simpl.Phys.DE Alex.aIF Arist.FcLc Alex.bLF Arist.CESUX Alex.aA Them. Syr. Asclep. Simpl.Phys. FWa Sophon. 4 scripsi Simpl.Phys. We shall concern ourselves first with the problems of the second and third lines, where the sense is not affected, and postpone for a while the more interesting problem of the first line. 1) The apparatus for Arist. de An. is a simplified version of that given by P. Siwek, AristotelisTractatus de Anima (Rome 1965). For the Aristotelian commen- tators, refer to the Berlin edition of the Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (except for Simpl. Phys. W, for which see below, n. 6).