Asian Women March 2018, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 23-48, https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2018.03.34.1.23 ＼ｇｒ｛ｇｚｏｕｔ＆ ｕｌ＆ ］ｕｓｋｔｙ＆ ＼ｏｘｍｏｔｏｚ｡＆ ｏｔ＆ ｚｎｋ＆ Ｖｎｏｒｏｖｖｏｔｋｙ０ 1 Eric Julian Manalastas University of Sheffield, UK Clarissa C. David University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines Ｇｈｙｚｘｇｉｚ Despite increasing sexual liberalization, virginity and its loss persist as contested and highly gendered concepts in many parts of Asia. According to theories in feminism and sexuality studies, virginity may be socially constructed as either a gift, a stigma, an act of worship, or a process. This paper examines the socially constructed values and meanings ascribed to women’s virginity in the context of the Philippines. We synthesize findings from quantitative sources and original qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with Filipino women and men. Subsequent analysis of these findings indicated that a strong, widespread importance is ascribed to women’s virginity. While men endorsed female virginity as important prior to marriage, women reported even more restrictive views ˁ including legitimizing beliefs linking virginity to women’s worth and to the avoidance of marital conflict. Filipina women expressed disapproval of sex for unmarried women, but less for unmarried men, and placed less importance on male virginity. The evidence indicates the presence of a sexual double standard and supports the argument that women themselves may endorse cultural belief systems that restrict female sexuality. Female virginity was dominantly constructed either as a gift (an embodied resource given by women to men) or, more often, as a prize to be claimed by men from women within the context of heterosexual marriage. Male virginity, in contrast, was largely viewed as a stigma. Virginity loss was not construed as a normative developmental process, nor, despite the predominance of Roman Catholicism in Philippine culture, a sacred act with religious underpinnings. Ｑｋ｡＆ ｝ｕｘｊｙ virginity, virginity loss, sexual double standard, Philippines * Parts of this study were conducted through a grant to the second author from the UPCMC Foundation and the Philippine Center for Population and Development.