Chrysidid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Cretaceous
Burmese amber: Phylogenetic affinities and classification
Daercio A.A. Lucena
a
, Gabriel A.R. Melo
b, *
a
Laborat orio de Biologia Comparada e Abelhas (LBCA), Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ci^ encias e Letras de Ribeir~ ao Preto, Universidade
de S~ ao Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, 14040-901, Ribeir~ ao Preto, S~ ao Paulo, Brazil
b
Universidade Federal do Parana, Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratorio de Biologia Comparada de Hymenoptera, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980,
Curitiba, Paran a, Brazil
article info
Article history:
Received 3 November 2017
Received in revised form
10 February 2018
Accepted in revised form 20 March 2018
Available online 22 March 2018
Keywords:
Chrysidoidea
Cladistics
Comparative morphology
Cuckoo wasps
abstract
Representatives of chrysidid wasps are described for the first time from inclusions in Late Cretaceous
Burmese amber. Five new genera and new species are described and illustrated: yAuricleptes nebulosus
gen. et sp. nov., yAzanichrum pilosum gen. et sp. nov., yBohartiura glabrata gen. et sp. nov., yBurmasega
ammirabilis gen. et sp. nov., and yMiracorium tetrafoveolatum gen. et sp. nov. We coded 49 morphological
characters for species representing the subfamilies Amiseginae, Loboscelidiinae, Cleptinae and Chrys-
idinae. The cladistic analysis recovered the following relationships: Cleptinae þ (yAuricleptes þ
(yBurmasega þ (yMiracorium þ ((Loboscelidiinae þ Amiseginae) þ ((yAzanichrum þyBohartiura) þ
(yPalaeochrum Krombein þ (extant Chrysidinae)))))). In light of the cladistic results, we discuss the
implications of characters for the interpretation of phylogenetic relationships within the family, and
explore the main morphological changes occurred during the diversification of the chrysidid wasps.
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The diversity of Cretaceous insects revealed by inclusions in
Burmese amber has increased considerably in recent years (e.g.
Ross et al., 2010; Grimaldi, 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Ross, 2017). Many
of the described taxa have no counterparts in the extant fauna, with
some of them exhibiting very unique morphologies (e.g. Engel
et al., 2016; Perrichot et al., 2016; Barden et al., 2017; Rasnitsyn
et al., 2017).
In Hymenoptera, much of the diversity is represented by
families with extant descendants, although 12 of the 37 recorded
families constitute extinct lineages (compiled from Ross, 2017 ,
with modifications). Among the stinging Hymenoptera (Aculeata),
13 families have representatives in Burmese amber, with a single
familydFormicidaedcontaining almost half of the described
species (20 of 50 named species). In Chrysidoidea, the 12
described species belong to the families Bethylidae, Dryinidae,
Embolemidae and Falsiformicidae (Burmomyrma is most likely a
falsiformicid, and not a formicid as proposed originally by Dlussky
(1996), and the two putative Scolebythidae described recently by
Cockx and McKellar (2016) probably do not belong in this family;
Melo, unpubl. data).
Up to now, chrysidid wasps have not been reported from Bur-
mese amber. Chrysididae are a diverse group mostly composed of
parasitoid and cleptoparasitic wasps distributed worldwide. The
clade is divided into four main groups: (1) the Cleptinae, which
parasitize prepupal larvae of sawfly wasps; the clade composed of
the pan-tropical (2) Amiseginae and (3) Loboscelidiinae, both
containing parasitoids specialized on eggs of phasmatodean
walking sticks; and (4) the colorful clade composed of the chrys-
idine cuckoo wasps, which are specialized cleptoparasites attacking
primarily other solitary aculeate hymenopterans (Kimsey and
Bohart, 1991).
The oldest fossils assigned to the family are dated from the Late
Cretaceous amber of Canada (Canadian amber; Campanian) (Evans,
1969; McKellar and Engel, 2014), Siberia (Taimyr amber; late Cen-
omanian and Santonian) (Evans, 1973; Krombein, 1986), and France
(Charentese amber; late Cenomanian) (Cockx et al., 2016). Other
taxa assumed to be closely related to the living groups are known
from the Eocene amber deposits of the Baltic region (Brues, 1933;
Krombein, 1986), Russia (Kaliningrad) (Bischoff, 1916), and
Ukraine (Rovno) (Perkovsky and Rasnitsyn, 2013); and taxa from
the early Miocene from the Dominican Republic (Engel, 2006). * Corresponding author.
E-mail address: garmelo@ufpr.br (G.A.R. Melo).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Cretaceous Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.03.018
0195-6671/© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Cretaceous Research 89 (2018) 279e291