Soil and biomass mercury emissions during a prescribed fire in the
Amazonian rain forest
Jose J. Melendez-Perez
a
, Anne H. Fostier
a, *
, Jo
~
ao A. Carvalho Jr.
b
,
Claudia C. Windm
€
oller
c
, Jos
e C. Santos
d
, Anthony Carpi
e
a
Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, P.O. Box 6154,13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
b
S~ ao Paulo State University, UNESP, Av. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333,12516-410 Guaratinguet a, SP, Brazil
c
Department of Chemistry, Minas Gerais Federal University, UFMG, P.O. Box 702, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
d
National Space Research Institute, INPE, Rodovia Presidente Dutra Km 40, 12630-000 Cachoeira Paulista, SP, Brazil
e
John Jay College, CUNY, Department of Sciences, 445 W 59th St, New York, NY 10019, USA
highlights graphical abstract
4.1 ± 1.4 g mercury ha
1
were
released from a prescribed fire in the
Amazon basin.
Litterfall and the soil O-horizon
accounted for 78% of released Hg.
Wood accounted for the smallest
contribution emitted mercury.
Gaseous mercury continued to be
released from soil following the burn
event.
article info
Article history:
Received 18 November 2013
Received in revised form
14 June 2014
Accepted 16 June 2014
Available online 21 June 2014
Keywords:
Forest fire
Mercury emissions
Amazon
abstract
Mercury stored in forests can be volatilized to the atmosphere during fires. Many factors influence this
process such as mercury concentration, vegetation loading and the soil temperature reached during the
fire. We quantified mercury emissions from biomass and soil during a prescribed fire in Brazil using the
difference in mercury burden in vegetation and soil before and after burning, and data were critically
compared with those previously obtained in a similar experiment in another part of the Amazonia. The
calculated mercury emission factor was 4.1 ± 1.4 g Hg ha
1
, with the main part (78%) originating from
litterfall and O-horizon, and only 14% associated with live biomass. When considering the fuel burned
loading, the emission factor ranged from 40 to 53 mg Hg kg
1
. Data were also obtained on soil tem-
perature profile and on Hg speciation in soil in an effort to relate these parameters to Hg emissions.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Forest canopies are effective in trapping atmospheric mercury
(Hg) because they present a large adsorption and assimilation
surface area for particulate and gaseous mercury (Fay and Gustin,
2007; Frescholtz et al., 2003). Mercury compounds that accumu-
late on foliage are then transferred to the soil by foliage wash off (by
rainfall) and by litterfall deposition (Rea et al., 2002). In this
manner, forest ecosystems act as an Hg sink, limiting the mobility of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: magojmp@hotmail.com (J.J. Melendez-Perez), fostier@iqm.
unicamp.br (A.H. Fostier), joao@feg.unesp.br (J.A. Carvalho), claudiaufmg@
hotmail.com (C.C. Windm€ oller), jcarlos@lcp.inpe.br (J.C. Santos), acarpi@jjay.cuny.
edu (A. Carpi).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Atmospheric Environment
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.032
1352-2310/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Atmospheric Environment 96 (2014) 415e422