Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Theologia Reformata Transylvanica, 62/2 (2017) DOI: 10.24193/subbtref.62.2.07 Published Online: 2017-12-20 Published Print: ൠൡ൧-ൡ-ൠ Gábor János Lányi 1 : Zwinglian–Calvinit Debate on Church Discipline in the Pays de Vaud Abstract he article discusses a theological debate on church discipline between Calvinist pastors living in the French speaking territory of Pays de Vaud and the Zwinglian City-state of Berne from the mid-1530s to 1560. From 1536 Pays de Vaud belonged to the Bernese protestant administration but consisted primarily of French refugee pastors allegiant to Calvin and his ideas. hey Calvinists of Pays de Vaud ques- tioned the civil magistrate’s right to interfere into church afairs especially into the practice of church discipline, such as exclusion from the Lord’s Supper and excom- munication from the congregation. According to the Zwinglian establishment of Berne the right for exclusion and excommunication belonged to the civil magis- trates. In the Calvinists’ view the appropriate administrator of the exclusion and excommunication was the Genevian-type consistory, consisting of both clerical and civilian elected members. Noteworthy signiicance can be attributed to the events in the Pays de Vaud. On the one hand, banished from Bernese territory most of the Calvinist pastors of Vaud were sent to reinforce the French underground evangelical movement. he Calvinists’ failure in the Pays de Vaud turned Calvin’s attention to France by which the Calvinism became a world phenomenon. On the other hand, from this struggle emerged a theological justiication for the state’s supremacy over church afairs, namely by Wolfgang Musculus’ De Magis- tratibus. Interestingly, this justiication played a more important role in later times than in the actual controversy: homas Erastus, the builder of the territorial state– church of the Palatinate, John Withgift, the archbishop of Canterbury and the pro- tector of Tudor-Absolutism against the Puritans, and the Dutch Remonstrants all were inluenced by the teaching of Musculus. he goal of this paper is to present how the two controversial sides regulated its church afairs and, in addition, to show the highpoint of the debate between Cal- vin’s Vaudois adherers and the Bernese Magistrate for the government of the church, especially for the right of excommunication. 1 Egyetemi adjunktus, KGRE Budapest, Református Teológiai Kar, lanyi.gabor@kre.hu.