A Circular Sierpinski fractal antenna for UWB applications
A. El Hamdouni
LAMEET Laboratory of Faculty of
Sciences and Techniques of Settat
Morocco
akram.elhamdouni@yahoo.fr
A. Tajmouati
LAMEET Laboratory of Faculty of
Sciences and Techniques of Settat
Morocco
tajmoua@gmail.com
J. Zbitou
LAMEET Laboratory of Faculty of
Sciences and Techniques of Settat
Morocco
jazbitou@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
In this paper
1
a depicted survey of a Coplanar Waveguide (CPW)
printed antenna achieved by using the Sierpinski Gasket as fractal
geometry in the radiator which is taken as circular shape, the
iterations has been performed three times in order to improve the
matching of Input Impedance at 50 in the Ultra-wide band
(UWB), which is the frequency range 3.1 – 10.4 GHz released by
the Federal Communications commission (FCC). The
electromagnetics solvers CST of Microwave Studio have been
used to design the proposed antenna by the methods of
optimization included in the software tool and to compute the
coefficient of reflection and the gain radiation pattern. The FR4
has been chosen as substrate to simulate the printed antenna with
an overall dimension of 34 x 43 mm
2
.
KEYWORDS
CPW, Fractal Geometry, Sierpinski Gasket, Input Impedance,
UWB, Gain, Radiation Pattern.
1 INTRODUCTION
The Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) device is one of the techniques
of feeding which is become more and more involved in the
domain of printed antenna due to several and unique features
missed in the others methods of antenna conception. So it’s
important to note that CPW antennas are characterized by a less
dispersion, low radiation loss, simplicity to design and integrate
with passive and active circuits, also the CPW antenna is one of
Permission Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or
distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and
the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by
others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy
otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior
specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from Permissions@acm.org.
ICCWCS'17, November 14–16, 2017, Larache, Morocco
© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery.
ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-5306-9/17/11…$15.00
https://doi.org/10.1145/3167486.3167560
the devices that can be operate in wider bandwidth by a good
input impedance matching. Those advantages are because of the
way of configuration of this kind of antennas which is based on
co-location in the same side of substrate the ground, the feed line
and the radiator, by depositing symmetrically of the feed line
conductor in between the two narrow grounds [1–4].
The Fractal geometry can used together with CPW feeding
method in order to give some specifics characteristics such self-
similarity which is mandatory to improve the matching of input
impedance in some frequencies and the space filling which can be
utilized to increase the miniaturization behavior, also the fractal
technique can help to optimize the gain of the antennas that can be
used in the indoor applications.
There are many fractal geometries to etch the CPW antennas such
as the Sierpinski Carpet, Cantor Set, Koch Curves and Sierpinski
Gasket. The last one still the more popular geometry used in the
printed antenna. The process to create the Sierpinski Gasket
geometry is given by two steps which are iterated infinitely, the
first step is to take a plane triangle and the second step is to
remove a central triangle with vertices which are located at the
midpoint first triangle sides [5–8].
The CPW feeding technique merged with Sierpinski Gasket
fractal geometry become widely existing in the design of printed
antenna proposed for Ultra-Wide Band applications.
Therefore the definition of UWB still too complicated due to the
diversity of standards. The definition of UWB in European
regulation based on the use of spectral masks in order to classify
the applications by frequency range, while the American
regulation is based on two main standards to provide a definition
of the UWB, the first one is by The Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) which use the below Taylor
expression.
= 2
−
+
(1)
Where is the fractional Bandwidth of the signal and
respectively is the higher and is the lower -3dB point in a
spectrum.
According to DARPA a signal is identified as UWB when the
is greater than 0.25.