Journal of Basic and Applied Engineering Research
p-ISSN: 2350-0077; e-ISSN: 2350-0255; Volume 4, Issue 3; April-June, 2017, pp. 229-233
© Krishi Sanskriti Publications
http://www.krishisanskriti.org/Publication.html
Study on Membrane Fouling in Vacuum
Membrane Distillation for Desalination
Jitendra Kumar Singh
1
, Sushant Upadhyaya
2
, S.P. Chaurasia
3*
and Rakesh Baghel
4
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, IET, JK Lakshmipat University Jaipur (India)
2,3,4
Department of Chemical Engineering, MNIT Jaipur (India)
E-mail:
1
jitendrasingh.chmnit@gmail.com
Abstract—In this work, membrane fouling was studied in vacuum
membrane distillation for different pore sizes and membrane
materials. Hydrophobic membrane of PTFE and PVDF was taken of
two different pore diameter viz0.22 and 0.45 micron in a membrane
module. The experiments were carried out using aqueous feed
solution of NaCl at different feed concentrations over a period of
200hrs and 340hrs for different membranes. The decline in permeate
flux was observed as 1.7% & 4.0 % for 0.22 μm PTFE membrane
and 4.0 % & 9.0 % for 0.22 μm PVDF membrane in 200 hrs and 340
hrs continuous run respectively. Similarly the decline in permeate
flux was observed for 0.45 μm PTFE & PVDF membranes, 2.6 % &
7.2% and 6.3% & 12.5% respectively in 200hrs and 340 hrs
continuous run. SEM analysis was also carried out new brand and
used membranes after 200hrs and 340hrs run time which confirmed
the deposition of feed solute on membrane surface. This minor scale
deposition is also evident from pore size distribution (PSD) which
indicated that average pore size in PSD curve shifted from 0.22 μm
to 0.18 μm and this little problem was very easily overcome by water
washing.
Keywords: Vacuum membrane distillation, Specific energy,
PTFE, Ion meter, NaCl, Reverse Osmosis.
1. INTRODUCTION
Membrane distillation (MD) is known to be one of the
growing non-isothermal membrane separation processes [1].
MD is a technique which leads toan almost complete water
recovery. MD is defined as thermally driven transport process
of vapor through hydrophobic membranes, the basic driving
force in MD is the vapor pressure difference through
membrane thickness. However, in other membrane separation
processes, the basic driving force is the chemical potential
difference through the membrane thickness [2–4]. Different
MD configurations such as direct contact MD, sweeping gas
MD, air gapMD, and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD)
are used rapidly for various applications (desalination, water-
reuse, food, medical, etc.). The resulting driving force of
vapor pressure difference produces a flux of water vapor
through the membrane, and thus, aqueous brine solutions can
be concentrated and crystallized. This process can work on
high solute concentration at feed side, at low concentration
gradients, moderate temperature, and atmospheric pressure
[5].
The advantages of VMD compared to other more popular
separation processes are theoretically 100% rejection of ions,
colloids, macro molecules, and other non-volatiles, lower
operating pressure than conventional pressure-driven
membrane separation processes, lower operating temperature
than conventional distillation, and reduced vapor pressure
compared to conventional distillation processes. VMD differs
from the other membrane technologies in that the basic driving
force for desalination is the difference in vapor pressure of
water across the membrane, rather than total pressure. In
VMD configuration, the vapor permeated does not condense
in cooling chamber, but is drawn out by vacuum and
condenses externally in a condenser. The pressure difference
between the two sides of the membrane creates a convective
mass flow along the pores that contribute to the total mass
transfer for VMD.
In this paper, membrane fouling was extensively studied on
membrane surfaces of different pore sizes and membrane
materials. The deposition of salts was determined using the
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the reduction of
pore size was confirmed using pore size distribution analysis.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
The experimental VMD permeate flux (N, kg/m
2
h) is
calculated by equation (1):
Where V is volume of permeate water (l); ρ is density of
permeate water (kg/l); A is effective membrane area (m2) and t
is the running time of VMD. The concentration of ionic species
in the feed water (C1, mg/l) and in permeate water (C2, mg/l)
were calculated by the conductivity meter [1,8]. The
percentage removal (% R) of the species was calculated from
equation (2):
1 2
1
100
C C
R
C