Relatuhedron: Perplexity-Action Model of Indigenous Food (in)Security Crisis Relatuhedron A Crisis perplexity-action model applied to Indigenous Food (in)security and Health Systems Juan Carlos Rodriguez Camacho In this first chapter I will describe some of the main sides of the perplexity-action model from the perspective of the Relatuhedron (Rodriguez, 2015, 2016; Mashford-Pringle & Rodriguez, 2017). The relatuhedron means shape and shaped by relationships, a place where multilevel and multiperspectives can be placed in infinite spaces of relationship and emerged knowledges can be adjusted to respond with meta theories (theories of theories), macro-heuristics (actions of actions) and interventive levels (transformative actions) in the different levels of the complex dynamic systemic perspective. The present text is focused on the social health crisis perspectives of the perplexity-action postmodern, deconstructive approach (Derrida, 2016, 1987; Deleuze & Guattari, 2004; Foucault, 1980). The model works under the assumption that health is not only considered from the biomedicine perspective but under the social determinants of health (Dahlgren & Whitehead, 1991; Raphael, 2009), the multilevel approach to epidemiology (Institute of Medicine, 2000) and the Indigenous socio determinants of health (Graham & Stamler, 2010). From this general description students taking the course Indigenous Food (in)Security and Health Systems will deconstruct the method, the crisis, and innovative solutions and perspectives. Rodriguez, Mashford-Pringle, 2019 12 Perplexity is understood as a method to get in and out from complexity and the emotional, mental, spiritual and physical impacts created by a broad vision of reality perspectives that support conventional representations, as a way of understanding the confused, blurred or uncontrolled complexities. Social and health perplexity-action perspectives can be located inside the logic between the impossibility to change reality, the need to confirm and search for consensus and science as a source of certainty and the urgency to return to the ethnicity of Indigenous peoples as an alternative to reach balance between human-nature-creatures. In the sense of Javier Muguerza’ discourse (1990), perplexity is a rationalism which does not accept the dogmatism and skepticism created under social reality that affirms social crises are “like this” and will be “like this” forever. But in contrast with Muguerza’s proposal, disagreement with the injustice of current systems is not a solution for perplexity. Perplexity is understood here as an ideal position of social argumentation, which intermixed with utopic-creative thinking, creates infinite possibilities for transformative action. Perplexity is then an exit from postmodern traps of destruction of natural, cultural and social systems caused by human-nature-human relations of modernity and technology, by opening senses and real opportunities to address unresolved, systemic and structural issues throughout exploration of infinite perspectives of change. Is in that sense that a Wigwam-Relatuhedron opens discourses and transformative practices. The perplexity-action model is proposed as a complementary paradigm to complexity, inviting one to reflect on reality under the compromise of creative and transformative action, under critical and complex dynamic systems perspectives of change. Controlling systems of power and knowledge, imposed on current societies as the “norm”, frequently immobilize individual thinking and transformative action systems outside the system’s dynamics, by destroying any possibility of individualistic expression or community-based solutions and correcting the