Take Users Seriously, But Take a Deeper Look: Organizational and Technical Effects from Designing with an Ethnographically Inspired Approach Jesper Simonsen and Finn Kensing Computer Science Department Roskilde University Denmark Tel: +4546 75 77 11 E-mail: simonsenlkensing@dat.ruc.dk ABSTRACT In this paper we address how to do reliable systems design in small complex organizations - small in the sense that the design project we use as an example has approximately 50 employees, and complex in the sense that the employees had very different roles and relationships. We use the term design in the same way as architects do - focusing on the analysis of needs and the preliminary design of functionality and form - in contrast to what is common within computer science, where the design term is borrowed from engineering - focusing on construction and implementation. Current approaches used in industry and published in literature (e.g. SA, SO, OOA, and 000) tend to ignore design as being a political endeavour also. Also they tend to neglect the potentials in participatory design, and/or they tend to homogenize users not being sensitive towards individual needs. Our approach is more in line with ongoing research within Participatory Design, in that we see results of a design project to include a conceptual design in terms of a written document, sketches, mock ups and/or prototypes. We consider an evaluation of individual and organizational consequences of implementing the design as well as a plan for the implementation to be part of the result. ' Ethnographic approaches to systems design has proved valuable, especially within highly specialized product development and research oriented design settings, reports on concrete consequences on a specific design due to such an approach seem scarce. We reflect upon an action research project carried out over a period of 1 112 years in a public organization in Northern Europe. We were called upon to conduct what ended up as 3 design projects. Having a design approach In PDC'94: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. R. Trigg, S.l. Anderson, and E.A. Dykstra- Erickson (Eds.). Chapel Hill NC USA, 27-28 October 1994. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, P.O. Box 717, Palo Alto CA 94302-0717 USA, cpsr@cpsr.org. 47 inspired by ethnography and intervention, we did in-depth analysis of current work practices, carried out unstructured interviews, observation, video recording, document analysis, and the like. We set up participatory analysis and design workshops. The organization is currently implementing our visions and design proposals. We are presenting the setting we have worked in, the establishment of the project, the activities we carried out in one of the design projects, and some consequences our approach had on the final design. All three design projects are documented in Simonsen, (1994). We conclude by discussing some of the organizational and technical effects the approach had on our design, as well as political dilemmas we got involved in. The setting presented here represents the application area of the design approach we are developing: computer support for complex administrative, managerial, and professional work. The management's attitude is probably important for the relations we seek to establish with the individuals and the organization. Management should state that the purpose of the design project is supporting the existing workforce in meeting current and new challenges rather than headcount reduction. INTRODUCTION We spent approximately 14 person weeks over a period of 10 months on the project because it was also a research project. Had it been a real life consulting job, our estimate would be approximately 10 person weeks. One of our goals in involving ourselves in action research is to develop an understanding of the conditions for and effects of applying ethnographically inspired approaches in systems design. This is part of our research 1 on theories of and approaches to early systems design processes. Part of our ongoing work is to relate results from our own design projects, results from others using our approach, and study results of designers working in industrial settings. Our research approach combines an ethnographically inspired approach with an interventionist approach. At a theoretical level there is a tension between those two approaches: the traditional In addition to the authors the research group consists of Keld B0dker and Lars Bogetoft Pedersen.