Ian James Kidd, Jose Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus, Jr. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice What is epistemic injustice? Who is vulnerable to it, and whom does it affect? What forms does it assume? What are its political and social consequences? And finally, how can we counter it? In a colossal volume extending over forty chapters, Ian James Kidd, Jose Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus, Jr. have collected a rich philosophical resource on epistemic injustice. Although epistemic injustice is roughly outlined to include those cases where a person is harmed as an epistemic subject, it is, according to the authors, best understood by reference to the sheer plurality of its forms. The volume progresses in a linear fashion: after opening with a section on central theoretical concepts, it elaborates on the philosophical and political ramifications of epistemic injustice and closes with case studies of localized injustices. As the editors stress in the introduction, our social setting of incessant communication calls for special attention to the power dynamics immanent in those interactions. The authors, bridging the analytical- continental divide, draw from a diverse pool of intellectual sources. Amy Allen, for one, lauds Foucault’s analysis of the role of power in the production of knowledge (187), and Lisa Guenther expands epistemological debates to Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenological tradition (195). The volume is structured into five thematic clusters. The first, titled Core concepts, introduces the reader to the vocabulary used in discussions about epistemic injustice, pointing at potential interpretative difficulties and points of conflict. Gaile Pohlhaus, Jr., for instance, underlines the difficulty of defining epistemic injustice without inadvertently excluding those experiences of marginalization obscured by our limited social perspective (14). Although the focus is chiefly on those debates about epistemic injustice that had followed Miranda Fricker’s eponymous work, the contributors acknowledge prior mentions of silencing and marginalization in feminist and intersectional discourse. With chapters defining the notions of testimonial and hermeneutical injustice, the first cluster functions as a toolbox for navigating the rest of the volume, and literature on epistemic injustice in general. The second section, Liberatory epistemologies and axes of oppression, explores how discussions about epistemic injustice interact with political currents in feminism, racial theory, post-colonial movements, and disability studies. The third thematic unit, Schools of thought and subfields within epistemology, examines different philosophical toolkits that can aid us in thinking about epistemic injustice. The mentioned sources range from continental thought, such as that of Foucault and Merleau-Ponty, to the pragmatist tradition (205) and the nascent branch of vice