Article Cosmopolitanism – Not a ‘major ideology’, but still an ideology Asger Sørensen Aarhus University, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Today the idea of cosmopolitanism has become widely accepted as an appropriate answer to what we now call globalization. A key reference is Kant who argues for a Recht of the world citizen, and this is normally understood as a cosmopolitan law. Apparently Kant lets the law of the world citizen be limited to a right to visit, but somehow his peace project must imply something more than just this very modest claim. Following a hint from Kant himself I take a closer look at the material aspect of cosmopolitanism, i.e. the economy of travelling, and it appears that cosmopolitanism can function as an ideology for letting possible investors look for business cases, that is, for promising places for capitalist exploitation. As an answer to such strong material processes cosmopolitanism is insuffi- cient, both as a moral imperative and as a stipulated right. What we need is a more comprehensive political and legal perspective and the solutions this indicates. To get inspiration for this, however, we can turn to Kant again, since it turns out that he does not argue for cosmopolitanism at all, neither as a programme nor as an ideology. For Kant the overall goal is perpetual peace, and the law of the world citizen represents only one subordinate element. As an answer to globalization we should thus drop the limited ideal of cosmopolitanism and follow Kant in his ambition of a threefold political constitution comprising state law, law of the people and law of the world citizen. Keywords exploitation, peace, republicanism, travelling, world citizenry Introduction Today the idea of cosmopolitanism has become widely accepted as an appropriate answer to what we now call globalization, and in the most recent edition of Blackwell’s Corresponding author: Asger Sørensen, Department of Education, Aarhus University, Tuborgvej 164, DK-2400 Copenhagen NW, Denmark. Email: aso@edu.au.dk Philosophy and Social Criticism 2016, Vol. 42(2) 200–224 ª The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0191453714566483 psc.sagepub.com at Universidad de Valencia on January 18, 2016 psc.sagepub.com Downloaded from