doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.04.016
● Original Contribution
DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FLOW-VELOCITY IMAGE ANALYSIS
FOR PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
HAYIT GREENSPAN,* ORON SHECHNER,* MICKEY SCHEINOWITZ,*
†
and MICHA S. FEINBERG
‡
*Department of Biomedical Engineering,
†
Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute and
‡
The Heart Institute, Sheba
Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
(Received 21 August 2004; revised 14 April 2005; in final form 21 April 2005)
Abstract—Currently, Doppler echocardiography analysis is performed manually. An automated method that
analyzes the Doppler signal can potentially improve accuracy and result in a powerful tool for noninvasive
evaluation of cardiac hemodynamics, especially for patients with atrial fibrillation, where multiple samples are
needed to obtain an accurate averaged measurement. The aim of this study was to develop an automated method
for Doppler analysis based on image processing and computer vision algorithms. Images were obtained from the
mitral valve and the tricuspid valve Doppler tracings from 45 patients, 20 with normal sinus rhythm and 25 with
atrial fibrillation. The proposed algorithm automatically detects the maximal velocity envelope of the spectral
Doppler ultrasound tracings. Averaged values for the time velocity integral, peak mitral inflow velocity and peak
tricuspid regurgitation velocity were calculated for multiple beats available in a single screen frame. Measure-
ments extracted automatically from the maximal velocity envelope were compared to measurements obtained
manually by two expert technicians. High linear correlation (r) was found between the automatically- and the
manually-extracted parameters (0.95 < r < 0.99). A smaller variation was found in most cases between the
manually-calculated average beat and the automated average beat (bias value between 3.8% and 5.2%) than
between the manually-calculated average beat and the selection of a representative beat (bias value between 6.2%
and 2.6%). The newly-developed automated method offers a new, accurate and reliable clinical tool, particu-
larly for the assessment of patients with irregular heart rate. (E-mail: hayit@eng.tau.ac.il) © 2005 World
Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
Key Words: Doppler echocardiography, Blood flow velocity, Maximal velocity envelope, Image processing, Edge
detection, Automated system, Atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION
Cardiac Doppler blood flow tracings are a valuable tool
for the noninvasive assessment of cardiac function (Om-
men and Nishimura 2003; Troughton et al. 2003). The
Doppler signals are subject to great variation between
subjects, changes related to flow and heart rate and
within subjects with irregular heart rates. Manual tracing
of the Doppler signals is used to extract the maximal
velocity envelope (MVE) and corresponding parameters.
This type of approach is time-consuming and sometimes
has limited reproducibility (Galderisi et al. 1992). These
shortcomings worsen when dealing with signals taken
from patients with irregular heart rates, such as in atrial
fibrillation (AF). In these patients, subjectively defined
“representative” beats are used to extract specific param-
eters; thus, increasing bias in the analysis process. The
aim of this study was to develop an automated method
for Doppler analysis based on image processing and
computer vision algorithms that would reduce those lim-
itations.
Studies that deal with the automatic detection of
Doppler MVEs are mostly based on some form of noise
reduction and an edge-following algorithm, followed by
parametric model estimation. An overview of several
such works has been reported (Doherty et al. 2002).
Beat-by-beat analysis of Doppler tracings for the case of
the brachial artery was conducted by Tschirren et al.
(2000, 2001). Noise reduction as an initial preprocessing
stage was used, followed by advanced edge-detection
methodologies to extract the MVE and a final fitting of
the extracted waveform to a partial Fourier series model.
A more simplified edge-detection methodology, along
with averaging of the extracted MVEs, was used by Hall
and Kovacs (1994) as a means for noise removal, as well
Address correspondence to: Dr. H. Greenspan, Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978 Is-
rael. E-mail: hayit@eng.tau.ac.il
Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1031–1040, 2005
Copyright © 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0301-5629/05/$–see front matter
1031