International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 05 | May 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 662 Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of (G+10) R.C.C, Steel and Steel- Concrete Composite Building Krunal P Suthar 1 , Arjun M Butala 2 1 PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering, U.V.Patel College of Engineering, Kherva 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, U.V.Patel College of Engineering, Kherva ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - In India, reinforced concrete structures are in greater demands in construction because the construction becomes quite convenient and economical in nature. Steel- Concrete composite constructions are now a days very popular owing to their advantages over conventional concrete and steel constructions. Hence the aim of the present study is to compare seismic performance of a 3D (G+10) story RCC, Steel and Composite building frame situated in earthquake zone IV. All frames are designed for same gravity loadings. In RCC slab are used in all three types buildings. The sections of Beam and Column are made of either RCC, Steel or Steel-concrete composite sections. In a Seismic analysis Equivalent static method and Response Spectrum method are used. ETABS 2017 software is used and results are compared based on fundamental time period, displacements, story drift, base shear, story weight and story stiffness. Comparative study based on seismic analysis concludes that, RCC construction is best suited for low rise buildings among all the three types of constructions, but in a High rise building construction are Composite is a better options among the RCC and Steel Structures. Key Words: Seismic analysis, G+10 Building ETABS 2017, Response Spectrum Method, Comparative Performance. 1. INTRODUCTION Most of the building structures in India fall under the category of low-rise buildings. So, for these structures RC members are used widely because the construction becomes convenient and economical in nature. But since the population in cities is growing exponentially and the land is limited, there is a need of vertical growth of buildings in these cities. So, for the fulfilment of this purpose a large number of medium to high rise buildings are coming up these days. Now a days for these high-rise buildings, it has been found out that use of steel-concrete composite members in construction is more economic and effective than using reinforced concrete members. The most popularity and now a days economic of steel-concrete composite construction in cities can be owed to its advantage over the conventional reinforced concrete construction. RC frames are used in low rise buildings because loading is nominal. But in high-rise and medium buildings, the conventional reinforced concrete construction cannot be adopted as there is less stiffness and framework, increased dead load along with span restrictions, which is quite vulnerable to hazards. 1.1 Objective of Study 1. To determine the effect of earthquake various parameters like that Fundamental time period, story stiffness, drift, displacement, maximum story shear, weight of structures. 2. To reduce Story Drift and Displacement based on Seismic analysis. 3. To increase Base Shear of the Structures. 4. To comparative performance on Seismic analysis by response spectrum. 5. A construction Under the Effective solution of Structural element. 1.2 Method of Analysis The analysis is conducted for IS 1893(Part 1), 2016 specified Equivalent static analysis and Response spectrum method. a) Equivalent Static Analysis This method is based on the assumption that whole of the seismic mass of the structure vibrates with a single time period. The structure is assumed to be in its fundamental mode of vibration. But this method provides satisfactory results only when the structure is low rise and there is no significant twisting on ground movement. As per the IS 1893: 2002, total design seismic base shear is found by the multiplication of seismic weight of the building and the design horizontal acceleration spectrum value. This force is distributed horizontally in the proportion of mass and it should act at the vertical centre of mass of the structure. Design Seismic Base shear The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (VB) along any principal Direction of the building shall be determined by the following expression VB= Ah x W Where, Ah = Design horizontal seismic coefficient. W = Seismic weight of the building