Absolutely PHAB
Towards a general model of associative relations
Steve Pepper and Pierre J. L. Arnaud
University of Oslo | Université Lumière Lyon 2
There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modifcation
relations (ℜ) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the accep-
tance of a defnitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classifcation is a
worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binom-
inal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly
stating ℜ, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The
25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000
binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation
scheme (“Bourque2”) through the introduction of two new reversible rela-
tions. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher’s (1960) four-relation scheme
(extended by the addition of a ffh relation, similarity, as “Hatcher2”).
This results in a two-tier system usable at diferent degrees of granularities.
On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then
taken into account, following Janda’s (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in
word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts’ (2006) inventory of 23
metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confrming the identity of
metonymic and binominal modifcation relations. Finally, Blank’s (2003)
and Koch’s (2001) work on lexical semantics justifes the addition to the
scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristote-
lean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
Keywords: modifcation relations, compounds, binominal units, metonymy,
association relations, compound semantics
The research presented here was motivated by two observations made during our
work on the semantics of N + N compounds and other types of binominal lexemes.
There have been “innumerable attempts” (Bauer & Tarasova, 2013) to systematize
the semantic links in N + N compounds, but most researchers have devised new
classifcation schemes for the same data. This constant reinvention of the wheel is
an obstacle to progress in our understanding of compound semantics, and our frst
https://doi.org/./ml..pep
The Mental Lexicon : (), pp. –. issn - | e‑issn -
© John Benjamins Publishing Company