Feminist Studies 46, no. 2. © 2020 by Feminist Studies, Inc.    Transgender Women Belong Here: Contested Feminist Visions at the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival       . Clare Hemmings’s exploration of how feminists describe feminist history demonstrates the ease with which we create linear narratives of loss and progress that obscure the complexity of both current and past theories and practic- es. 1 Similarly, Finn Enke explores the risks of adhering to plausible nar- ratives about transgender women: such accounts ft understandings of transsexuality developed by psychiatric gatekeepers that transgender people were expected to construct in order to access medical transition. In requesting that contemporary feminists reject similarly coherent nar- ratives, Enke critiques accounts that assume trans-exclusion was inher- ent to 1970s feminism. In particular, Enke asks, “How did ‘1970s femi- nism’ enter collective memory as the exclusionary thing, distinct from the experiences, labor, and critiques by feminists of color, trans and queer people of the same era? And why, when existing nuanced narra- tives might invite us to deeper analysis, are stories of exclusion and abjec- tion so magnetic? More to the point, how might we highlight the mix- ings in the past and simultaneously envision a less polarized present?” 2 1. Clare Hemmings, Why Stories Matter: Te Political Grammar of Feminist Teory (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011). 2. Finn Enke, “Collective Memory and the Transfeminist 1970s: Toward a Less Plausible History,” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 5, no. 1 (2018): 10.