DNA Resonance by Max Rempel max@dnaresonance.org DRAFT 21 Feb 2021 How the biofield is created by DNA resonance Ivan Victorovich Savelev 1, 2 , Richard Alan Miller 3 , Max Myakishev-Rempel 1, 2 1. DNA Resonance Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA 2. Localized Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA 3. OAK, Inc., Grants Pass, OR, USA Introduction Biofield Although there is plenty of evidence for the existence of the biofield, the evidence that DNA interacts with it is very limited. Therefore, the idea that the biofield is created by the mass of DNA in the organism remains a hypothesis. We will first briefly summarize the existing evidence and then briefly review our studies, in which we used computational genomics to reveal the traces of resonance signaling in the genome and provided statistical evidence for this resonance signaling. The idea of the biofield is ancient. Indian yoga teaches about prana as life energy and chakras as centers of resonant vibration. Traditional Chinese medicine teaches about the meridians, which work as conduits of information, and herbal medicine for balancing the energies. Yoga and Chi-Gong teach the art of mastering the energies and redirecting them. Chi-Gong practitioners use body movements to send and direct the biofield energy through the air. Brief history of biofield research Scientific biological experimentation with biofields ran in parallel with the development of electromagnetic science. Franz Mesmer called it "animal magnetism". In his experiments, water and plants were charged by him with magnetism, and hypnotized (mesmerized) people were able to detect the presence of this energy [1,2]. The chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius proposed in the early 19th century that a regulative force exists within and maintains the functions of living matter [3]. A widely used physiology textbook of the 19th century by Johannes Peter Müller [4] taught that the presence of a soul makes each organism an indivisible whole and that the behavior of light and sound waves showed that living organisms possessed a life-energy unexplainable by physical laws. The concept of biofield was introduced by the experimental biologist and metaphysicist Hans Driesch. In 1892, Driesch proposed the field properties of organisms as a conclusion of his experiments with fertilized sea urchin eggs [5]. In the early 1920s, Alexander Gurwitsch, Hans Spemann, and Paul Weiss independently postulated the idea of "morphogenetic fields" that guide the organism's development [5]. This was experimentally proven by Gurwitsch and others [6–8]. Modern experiments demonstrated biological information can travel through the air [9–12]. Burlakov demonstrated that biological systems can strongly affect embryo development and that by manipulating the biofield it is possible to produce developmental abnormalities in fish embryos, causing them to develop extra heads and tails [13,14]. The effects of the biofield on embryos on each other were reproduced technologically - and the fields were produced by a device that caused similar developmental abnormalities in fish embryos [13,14]. DNA as a source of the biofield We (RAM) proposed the idea that the mass of the DNA of the organism is a source of the biofield 46 years ago (Miller et al., 1975; Miller and Webb, 1973). This idea makes a lot of sense. All of the genetic information about an organism is located in DNA. The genome is a complex instruction, 3.2 billion bases long, located in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA is one of the most harmoniously structured biomolecules; it comprises a substantial amount of the body. An average adult body contains about 300 grams of DNA or 0.3% of the body weight. Since we already know that the biofield exists, it makes much sense that it should be directly defined by the genome of each cell and for the genomes of all cells to communicate with each other 1