J Oral Maxillofac Surg
62:559-562, 2004
Inferior Meatal Antrostomy: Is It
Necessary After Radical Sinus Surgery
Through the Caldwell-Luc Approach?
Fouad A. Al-Belasy, BDS, MSc, PhD*
Purpose: In the Caldwell-Luc (CWL) operation, an antrostomy at the inferior meatus is created
surgically to promote sinus drainage. This inferior meatal antrostomy (IMA) has been criticized because
of the need for an additional time, early loss of the sinusotomy, injury to the nasolacrimal duct, epistaxis
from the sphenopalatine artery, and deviation from the normal sinus physiology. This trial was under-
taken with specific attention to the question: Is it necessary to perform antrostomy at the inferior meatus
after radical sinus surgery through the CWL approach?
Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients with a dental origin of sinus disease indicating the CWL
operation were entered into this trial. They were treated in blocks of 3, in which IMA was not performed
in the first and second patients of each successive block. Only the third patient of each block had IMA
performed. Cheek swelling, infection, and failure to relieve the patient’s symptoms were the criteria for
comparison between patient groups. Cheek swelling was measured by the eye-mouth line and the
ear-nose line on the second and fourth day after surgery.
Results: At no time was there a statistically significant difference in cheek swelling between the treated
groups (P .05). No infection or failure of treatment was encountered. However, some patients in both
groups had numbness or paresthesias of the cheek, upper lip, upper front gingiva, and teeth. These
complaints were transient and lasted for several weeks.
Conclusion: Based on our findings, it does not seem necessary to perform antrostomy at the inferior
meatus, provided the patient has a patent osteomeatal complex and no anatomic abnormalities.
© 2004 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:559-562, 2004
Since its introduction, the use of the Caldwell-Luc
(CWL) operation has been universally accepted in
cases of irreversible chronic maxillary sinusitis, antral
tumors, and trauma and as a technique for gaining
access to the pterygomaxillary fossa and perisinus.
1
The CWL operation is also required for removal of
mucoceles, pyoceles, intrasinus odontogenic cysts
and tumors, and foreign bodies, as well as for closure
of an oroantral fistula.
In the CWL operation, an opening at the inferior
meatus is created surgically. The purpose of perform-
ing this inferior meatal antrostomy (IMA) is to pro-
mote sinus drainage. Being in a more dependent po-
sition, the IMA theoretically allows passive drainage
of reaccumulated material.
1
Its more accessible loca-
tion also facilitates suction toilet postoperatively.
2
However, surgical creation of the IMA requires addi-
tional time and sometimes injures the nasolacrimal
duct.
3
Moreover, the IMA was reported to be closed
within 3 months after the operation in 82% of 367
cases.
4
This early loss suggests low value for the
sinusotomy.
3
This trial was undertaken with specific attention to
the question: Is it necessary to perform antrostomy at
the inferior meatus after radical sinus surgery through
the CWL approach?
Materials and Methods
A total of 33 male and female patients aged 21 to 39
years were included in the trial. At examination, they
were diagnosed as having a dental origin of sinus
disease that indicated radical sinus surgery via the
CWL approach (Table 1). They all were required to
have patent osteomeatal complex and to not have
anatomic abnormalities such as septal deviations, con-
cha bullosa, and nasal polyps. Patients were excluded
if they had a history of any immunocompromise con-
*Associate Professor, Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Den-
tistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Al-Belasy:
Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura Univer-
sity, Mansoura, Egypt; e-mail: albelasy@netscape.net
© 2004 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
0278-2391/04/6205-0006$30.00/0
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2003.07.009
559