Oncology
Evidence-based Sex-related Outcomes
After Radical Nephroureterectomy
for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma:
Results of Large Multicenter Study
Mario I. Fernández, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Vitaly Margulis, Christian Bolenz,
Francesco Montorsi, Nazareno Suardi, Mesut Remzi, Christopher G. Wood,
Marco Roscigno, Eiji Kikuchi, Mototsugu Oya, Richard Zigeuner, Cord Langner,
Alon Weizer, Yair Lotan, Theresa M. Koppie, Jay D. Raman, Pierre Karakiewizc,
Karim Bensalah, Marcela Schultz, and Pablo Bernier
OBJECTIVES To assess the sex differences in the clinical and pathologic characteristics of upper tract
urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to determine the effect on prognosis after radical nephroure-
terectomy (RNU) in a large multicenter series.
METHODS The records of 1363 patients who had undergone RNU were reviewed from the UTUC
Collaboration database. The median follow-up was 47 months (range 0-250). The pathologic
slides were re-evaluated by genitourinary pathologists unaware of the original findings from the
slides and the clinical outcomes. The endpoints were freedom from tumor recurrence and
disease-specific survival.
RESULTS The male-to-female ratio was 2.1:1. The women were older than the men at diagnosis (70 11 vs
68 11 years; P .001). No significant sex-related differences were found in the presence of
symptoms at presentation (P = .70), pathologic stage (P = .98), tumor grade (P = .28), tumor
architecture (P = .27), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = .42), presence of concomitant
carcinoma in situ (P = .08), or the presence of lymph node metastases (P = .24). Recurrence
developed in 379 patients (28%), and 313 patients (23%) died of their disease. Sex was not associated
with disease recurrence (P = .07) or disease-specific survival (P = .13). An adjustment for the effects
of the pathologic features did not change the lack of association of sex with the clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the largest series analyzing the effect of sex on the outcomes after RNU.
No difference was found in the clinicopathologic features or prognosis between women and men
treated with RNU for UTUC. The results of this large, international series show that RNU
provides durable local control and disease-specific survival for both men and women with
UTUC. UROLOGY 73: 142–146, 2009. © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
P
rimary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a
rare urologic malignancy, accounting for approxi-
mately 5% of all urothelial tumors.
1,2
Incidence re-
ports have shown a slight increase in the incidence until the
past decade, as well as a slight improvement in survival.
3
However, the current management recommendations have
been determined mainly from retrospective series and ex-
pert opinion because of a lack of controlled randomized
trials.
4
Overall, UTUC is 2-3 times more common in men
than in women in western countries.
3,4
In addition to the
previously well-known differences between men and
women regarding the prognosis of patients with bladder
urothelial carcinoma (UC),
5-7
reports have also been
published about the differences related to the clinical and
pathologic characteristics from single-center series be-
tween men and women treated for UTUC.
7
Moreover,
and similar to bladder UC, it has been suggested that the
stage-adjusted survival of UTUC among women could be
From the Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile; University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center, Dallas, Texas; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
Texas; Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec,
Canada; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Keio University School of Medicine,
Tokyo, Japan; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; University of Michigan School
of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of California, Davis, School of Medi-
cine, Sacramento, California; Cornell University, New York, New York; and Univer-
sity of Rennes, Rennes, France
Reprint requests: Mario I. Fernández, M.D., Department of Urology, Clínica
Alemana de Santiago, Av. Manquehue Norte 1410 Piso 12, Vitacura, Santiago de
Chile, Chile. E-mail: mfernandeza@alemana.cl
Submitted: June 8, 2008, accepted (with revisions): July 15, 2008
142 © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. 0090-4295/09/$34.00
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.042