BLOOD MANAGEMENT
Impact of cold storage on platelets treated with Intercept pathogen
inactivation
Katrijn R. Six ,
1,2
Rosalie Devloo,
1
Veerle Compernolle,
1,2,3
and Hendrik B. Feys
1,2
BACKGROUND: Pathogen inactivation and cold or
cryopreservation of platelets (PLTs) both significantly
affect PLT function. It is not known how PLTs function
when both are combined.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Standard PLT
concentrates (PCs) were compared to pathogen-
inactivated PCs treated with amotosalen photochemical
treatment (AS-PCT) when stored at room (RT, 22
C),
cold (4
C, n = 6), or cryopreservation (-80
C, n = 8)
temperatures. The impact of alternative storage methods
on both arms was studied in flow cytometry, light
transmittance aggregometry, and hemostasis in
collagen-coated microfluidic flow chambers.
RESULTS: Platelet aggregation of cold-stored AS-PCT
PLTs was 44% 11% compared to 57% 14% for cold-
stored standard PLTs and 58% 21% for RT-stored AS-
PCT PLTs. Integrin activation of cold-stored AS-PCT PLTs
was 53% 9% compared to 77% 6% for cold-stored
standard PLTs and 69% 13% for RT-stored AS-PCT
PLTs. Coagulation of cold-stored AS-PCT PLTs started
faster under flow (836 140 sec) compared to cold-stored
standard PLTs (960 192 sec) and RT-stored AS-PCT
PLTs (1134 220 sec). Fibrin formation rate under flow
was also highest for cold-stored AS-PCT PLTs. This was
in line with thrombin generation in static conditions
because cold-stored AS-PCT PLTs generated
297 47 nmol/L thrombin compared to 159 33 nmol/L
for cold-stored standard PLTs and 83 25 nmol/L for RT-
stored AS-PCT PLTs. So despite decreased PLT
activation and aggregation, cold storage of AS-PCT PLTs
promoted coagulation. PLT aggregation of cryopreserved
AS-PCT PLTs (23% 10%) was not significantly different
from cryopreserved standard PLTs (25% 8%).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that cold storage of
AS-PCT PLTs further affects PLT activation and
aggregation but promotes (pro)coagulation. Increased
procoagulation was not observed after cryopreservation.
C
onventional, room temperature (RT) storage of
platelets (PLTs) limits shelf life to between 4 and
7 days because of the risk of bacterial contamina-
tion and the decrease in PLT function called
platelet storage lesion.
1
The limited shelf life of PLT concen-
trates (PCs) hampers efficient inventory management and
puts pressure on blood banks trying to balance risks of short-
age with risks of wastage. Prolonging PC shelf life could over-
come this problem and has been investigated for decades
with a focus on cold storage (1-6
C)
2
and cryopreservation
(-80 to -196
C).
3,4
Cold storage can potentially increase PC shelf life beyond
7 days of storage.
5
Several reports indicate that cold-stored
PLTs are functionally “primed” suggesting that these are in a
state of heightened responsiveness to hemostatic stimuli.
5–7
The main obstacle for cold-stored PLTs is the significantly
faster clearance from circulation compared to RT storage.
2,8,9
This may be less relevant in acutely bleeding patients who
ABBREVIATIONS: AS-PCT = amotosalen photochemical treatment;
ETP = endogenous thrombin potential; MP = microparticle;
PC(s) = platelet concentrate(s); PS = phosphatidylserine; RT = room
temperature; TF = tissue factor.
From the
1
Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red
Cross-Flanders, the
2
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,
Ghent University, Ghent, and the
3
Blood Service of the Belgian Red
Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Address reprint requests to: Hendrik B. Feys, Transfusion
Research Center, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Ottergemsesteenweg
413, Ghent, 9000, Belgium; e-mail: hendrik.feys@rodekruis.be.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
This research was supported by the Foundation for Scientific
Research of the Belgian Red Cross Flanders. KRS is a fellow of the Special
Research Fund of Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (BOFDOC2016000401).
Received for publication December 12, 2018; revision received
May 23, 2019, and accepted May 23, 2019.
doi:10.1111/trf.15398
© 2019 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley
Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AABB.
TRANSFUSION 2019;00;1–10
TRANSFUSION 1