512
The Transformation of Hunger Revisited:
Estimating Available Calories from the
Budgets of Late Nineteenth-Century
British Households
IAN GAZELEY, ANDREW NEWELL,
AND MINTEWAB BEZABIH
Levels of nutrition among British worker’s households in the late nineteenth
century have been much debated. Trevon Logan (2006, 2009) estimated a very
ORZ DYHUDJH OHYHO RI DYDLODEOH FDORULHV 7KLV SDSHU UHH[DPLQHV WKH GDWD DQG ソQGV
average levels of available calories much more in line with existing studies, more
in line with what is known about energy requirements, and more in line with
other aspects of the data. In sum, British households were likely to have been
VLJQLソFDQWO\ EHWWHU IHG WKDQ /RJDQ UHSRUWV
I
n this article we re-examine one facet of the relationship between
income and nourishment. Based on his analysis of the household expen-
diture data set collected in 1888/89 by the United States Commissioner
for Labor (USCL),
1
Trevon Logan (2006, 2009) inferred that the house-
holds of American and British industrial workers in that period were
undernourished and hungry. Further, Logan offered evidence that these
households were much worse off in terms of available calories than, for
example, rural households in the Indian province of Maharashtra during
1983. Given that his evidence is inconsistent with the relativities in
widely accepted national real income estimates, Logan explicitly enter-
tained the possibility that such estimates are in need of revision (2009,
p. 405–6).
These are puzzling conclusions. To put them into context, Angus
Maddison’s (2003) estimate for British per capita gross domestic product
The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 75, No. 2 (June 2015). © The Economic History
Association. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1017/S0022050715000698
Ian Gazeley is Professor of Economic History, Department of History, University of Sussex,
Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QN. E-mail: i.s.gazeley@sussex.ac.uk. Andrew Newell is Professor
of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9SL.
(PDLO DWQHZHOO#VXVVH[DFXN 0LQWHZDE %H]DELK LV 5HVHDUFK 2IソFHU *UDQWKDP 5HVHDUFK
Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political
Science, Tower 3, Clements Inn Passage, London WC2A 2AZ. E-mail: m.bezabih@lse.ac.uk.
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the U.K. Economic and Social Research
Council (Research Grant RES-062-23-2054). The authors wish to thank the editors and two
anonymous referees for their many comments and suggestions. Errors remain our responsibilities.
1
Haines (1979).