10.1071/AM16012_AC © Australian Mammal Society 2017 Australian Mammalogy 39, 185–196 Supplementary material Resilience to agricultural habitat fragmentation in an arboreal marsupial Shaun W. Molloy A,B and Robert A. Davis A A School of Natural Sciences, Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia. B Corresponding author. Email: shaunecologist@gmail.com Table S1. Vegetation descriptions with (mean) canopy characteristics. Condition (Cond.) is given as a scale where 0 is parkland cleared, 1 poor and 5 excellent. Canopy cover (Fc), foliage cover (Ff) and LAI are then calculated for each canopy photograph. Calculations are given as LAI=FcInv(1-Ff/Fc)/k, (k is assumed to be 0.5), Fc =1-Gl/Pixt, Ff =1-Gt/Pixt. Pixt refers to the total number of pixels in a photograph. GI refers to the total number of pixels in large gaps in canopy (greater than 1%) and Gt figures to the number of pixels in all gaps in canopy cover. Veg # Vegetation Description Total m 2 % Total area Cond.  � Fc  � Ff  � LAI 1 Jarrah, Sheoak, Excellent Condition, not burned 15 years plus, excellent canopy, sparse understory. 404,070 40.24 5 0.9 0.7 10.2 2 Jarrah, Marri, Peppermint, Good Condition, not burned 15 years plus, good canopy, medium understory. 36,703 3.65 3 0.8 0.6 6.7 3 Jarrah, Marri, Good Condition, not burned 15 years plus, open understory, some grassy weeds. 28,439 2.83 3 1.0 0.6 7.2 4 Jarrah, Marri, Good Condition, not burned 15 years plus, herbaceous understory, some grassy weeds (<20%). 9,563 0.95 3 0.7 0.4 4.2 5 Jarrah, Marri, Fair Condition, not burned 15 years plus, open understory, some grassy weeds, Dieback. 14,611 1.45 2 0.6 0.5 6.7