JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE LETTERS 21, 2 0 0 2, 1631 – 1634 Effects of the grain size on the corrosion behavior of refined AISI 304 austenitic stainless steels A. DI SCHINO, J. M. KENNY Materials Engineering Center, University of Perugia, Loc. Pentima Bassa 21, 05100 Terni, Italy E-mail: kenny@unipg.it Although there have been many studies on fine grained ferritic steels, only a few research reports are available on refined austenitic stainless steels and, in particular, on the influence of the grain size on the corrosion resis- tance of this class of material [1, 2]. The grain size of ferritic steels can be easily induced by phase transfor- mation, but in austenitic alloys, following the absence of a phase transformation, the grain diameter is usually controlled by recrystallization after cold working [3]. This method is mainly affected by the working tem- perature, amount of deformation and recrystallization temperature. Recrystallization after hot rolling is re- ported to have the effect of grain refining [4] but this method seems to be limited. In a previous paper [5] we examined the effect of subzero working on the grain refining of austenitic stainless steels. In particular, ul- trafine grained AISI 304 stainless steel of ca. 1 μm av- erage grain size was obtained by applying the reverse transformation of martensite to austenite on subzero- worked steel annealed at low temperatures. Up to now, the corrosion behavior of such ultrafine- grained austenitic stainless steels has not been reported. This paper deals with the corrosion behavior, espe- cially general corrosion (GC), intergranular corrosion (IGC) and pitting corrosion (PC) of ultrafine-grained AISI 304 stainless steel. Results are compared with those of similar measurements on standard AISI 304 steel. The chemical composition of the AISI 304 stainless steel, obtained from a commercial batch, is shown in Table I. After subzero working down to 90% thickness reduction, the material was subjected to the following four heat treatments in order to obtain different mi- crostructures: annealing at 800 C for 160 s and 900 s (specimens A and B respectively) and at 1000 C for 10 s and 600 s (specimens C and D respectively). The grain sizes corresponding to the above specimens, as measured by automatic image analyzer, are shown in Table II. The typical microstructures of the 1 μm and 50 μm specimens are shown in Fig. 1. Tensile properties of the specimens are shown in Fig. 2. Ultimate tensile stress and 0.2% yield stress increase with decreasing grain size, according to the Hall Petch relation [6]. Steel materials were machined into corrosion test specimens of 15 × 15 × 1 mm. The specimen surface was polished by using increasingly finer abrasive pa- pers, starting with a 300 grit paper and finishing up with Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed. T A B L E I Chemical compositions of the material (wt%) C Mn Ni Cr Mo N Si AISI 304 0.06 1.50 8.6 18.4 0.06 0.024 0.61 T A B L E I I Grain sizes corresponding to the four analyzed specimens Sample Grain size (μm) A 1.1 B 3.0 C 10.2 D 50.0 Figure 1 Typical microstructures of AISI 304 steel with 1 μm and 50 μm average grain diameter. 0261–8028 C 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1631