Research Article
PostoperativeNew-OnsetAtrialFibrillationfollowingNoncardiac
Operations: Prevalence, Complication, and Long-Term MACE
Ofir Koren ,
1,2
Rony Hakim,
3
Asaf Israeli,
2
Ehud Rozner,
3
and Yoav Turgeman
1,2
1
Heart Institute, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
2
Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
3
Anesthesia Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
Correspondence should be addressed to Ofir Koren; drkorenofir@gmail.com
Received 25 June 2020; Revised 5 October 2020; Accepted 6 October 2020; Published 14 October 2020
Academic Editor: Andrea P. Rossi
Copyright©2020OfirKorenetal.isisanopenaccessarticledistributedundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background.Postoperativenew-onsetatrialfibrillation(POAF)isacommoncomplicationfollowingcardiothoracicsurgery,but
littleisknownregardingitsoccurrenceandoutcomefollowingnoncardiothoracicsurgery.isstudywasintendedtoexaminethe
incidence of POAF in noncardiothoracic surgeries performed under general anesthesia and its effects on the length of hos-
pitalization stay, short-term and long-term morbidity, and mortality. Methodology. We conducted a retrospective observational
descriptivestudy.estudypopulationconsistsofpatientshospitalizedinsurgicalwardsfromJanuary2014toDecember2017.
Surgery was defined as noncardiac or thoracic procedure conducted under general anesthesia. Results. A total of 24,125 general
anesthesiaoperationswereperformedat7surgicalwards.Abouttwo-fifthoftheoperations(40%)wereoperatedelectively,and
the rest underwent emergency surgery. e mean age was 63.78 ± 11.50, and more than half (56.9%) of the participants were
female. e prevalence of POAF was 2.69 per 1000 adult patients (95% CI: 2.11–3.43) and vary significantly among wards. e
highest prevalence was observed after hip fixation and laparotomy surgeries (54.9 and 26.7 per 1000 patients, respectively). e
medianlengthofhospitalizationwassignificantlyhigherinPOAFpatients(21.0vs.4.8days, p < 0.001).Patientswhodeveloped
POAFhadsignificantlyhighermortalityrates,bothinhospital(200vs.7.56deathsper1000, p � 0.001)and1year(261.5vs.33.3
per1000, p � 0.001,respectively).erewasnosignificantassociationbetweenoutcomeandtreatmentmodalitiessuchasrateor
rhythm control and anticoagulant use. Conclusion. New-onset AF following noncardiac surgery is rare, yet poses significant
clinicalimplications,bothimmediateandlong-term.POAFisassociatedwithalongerlengthofhospitalizationandasignificantly
higher mortality rate, both in short- and long-term.
1. Introduction
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most
common complications in patients undergoing cardiac
surgery. Its incidence is estimated to be about 30–60% of
patients. e occurrence of atrial fibrillation after surgery
results in longer hospitalization duration, higher morbidity
and mortality, frequent recurrences, and long-term risk of
stroke [1–3].
POAF has been extensively studied in the context of
cardiac surgery (CS) [4–7], but little is known about its
prevalence after noncardiac surgery (NCS). It is estimated
that the prevalence is between 5 and 10% of patients and is
dependent on many variables, such as age, cardiac dys-
function, and cardiovascular risk factors [8].
POAF is thought to occur as a result of adrenergic
stimulation, systemic inflammation, or activation of the
autonomousheartnervesduringsurgeryanduptofourdays
later, for various reasons. ese reasons include pain, low
bloodpressure,infection,andbleeding.POAFappearstobe
associated with myocardial injury or hypertension even
before surgery, possibly from hemodynamically alterations
or electrolytic disorders [9].
e therapeutic and preventive approach is unclear. A
rate control strategy does not appear to differ from rhythm
control therapy as far as mortality is concerned [10, 11].
Hindawi
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2020, Article ID 8156786, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8156786