International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 60 (2021) 102321
Available online 11 May 2021
2212-4209/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Community organization for the protection of cultural heritage in the
aftermath of disasters
David A. Torres Castro
Coordinaci´ on Nacional de Conservaci´ on Del Patrimonio Cultural (CNCPC), Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico
A R T I C L E INFO
Keywords:
Cultural heritage
Disaster
Mexico
Social response
Emerging organizations
ABSTRACT
When disasters occur, they have the potential to cause great damage to infrastructure and property, including
cultural heritage. This paper explores how and why communities may use traditional social structures, not
previously related to disaster management, to intervene and take independent actions in the protection of cul-
tural assets during emergencies. Through a case study in Mexico, the type of community organizations involved
during an emergency phase is reviewed, emphasizing the emerging and informal groups. In that context, the
thematic analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews conducted in this investigation revealed two factors that need
to be considered to understand what has driven those groups to physically engage in the rescue activities: a) the
pre-disaster relationship between institutions and the community, within the socio-political context; and b) the
cultural signifcance of the places or objects that are perceived at risk.
Additionally, this research demonstrates that the emergency actions for the protection of heritage assets taken
by the community have an important role for local communities as resilience drivers by helping them to organize
self-suffciently and face the loss. Thus, cultural sites and objects become physical nodes around which people
can improve risk awareness, fnd psychological relief and emerge as organized and more resilient groups. As a
result, this research concludes that cultural heritage can and should stand in the centre of collective participa-
tion, as it enhances people’s capacity to cope and reduce social vulnerability in disasters.
1. Introduction
When disasters occur, they have the potential to severely affect all
aspects of life, from physical resources such as infrastructure and
property, to social and cultural assets as well, affecting large regions and
disrupting livelihoods in many ways [1,2]. Among the large range of
possible impacts, cultural heritage is very likely to be found affected [3].
Besides the physical damage and loss, disasters also affect intangible
aspects of cultural heritage including skills, knowledge and cultural
practices, disrupting social and cultural continuity [4]. In response,
countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Spain or Ecuador are working towards
achieving some degree of institutional capacity to respond and cope
with the impact of disasters in cultural heritage as emergency manage-
ment plans and programs have been created over the last decades for this
purpose [5–8]. However, in the feld of cultural heritage management
this capacity to respond to emergencies is not often operational or is
found to be very limited. There is an observed lack of institutional
awareness and preparedness, particularly in developing countries, even
when it is recognized that cultural heritage is highly vulnerable to
damage [9,10]; M [11–13].
In this context, it has been observed that in some circumstances
communities organize independently at the local level and intervene
directly towards the temporary protection of cultural heritage immedi-
ately after a triggering event [13]. However, this does not happen in
every situation. Based on a case study of Tehuantepec in Mexico, this
work explores the different types of social groups that may be engaged
during emergencies and reveals the social meaning and values associ-
ated with heritage assets as the drivers to informal participation. The
question on when these collective processes are enabled, and which kind
of social, alternative and non-institutional structures are engaged is
discussed throughout the paper as well.
2. Cultural heritage and disaster risk management
The defnition of heritage is in constant change [14] and has evolved
signifcantly over the past decades [4]; J [13,15]. From proft-making
assets [16,17] to physical manifestations of the past [18,19], the
notion of cultural heritage has now expanded to incorporate immaterial
E-mail address: david_torres@inah.gob.mx.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijdrr
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102321
Received 29 November 2020; Received in revised form 4 May 2021; Accepted 6 May 2021