International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS) Peer-Reviewed Journal ISSN: 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O) Vol-8, Issue-5; May, 2021 Journal Home Page Available: https://ijaers.com/ Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.85.23 www.ijaers.com Page | 198 Evidence of GLBT in Brazilian Scientific Research: A State of the Art Francisco Ricardo Miranda Pinto, Carlos Antonio Bruno da Silva Colective Health Post Graduation Program, Fortaleza University, Brazil Received: 29 Jan 2021; Received in revised form: 29 Mar 2021; Accepted: 19 Apr 2021; Available online: 17 May 2021 ©2021 The Author(s). Published by AI Publication. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Keywords— Qualitative Research. Sexual Gender and Minorities, Systematic Review. . Abstract— A systematic qualitative review of State of the Art type developed to know the scientific evidence which exhibits Brazilian Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transvestite, and Transgender people experience. Texts included the LGBT population from 18 years of age. Inclusion criteria involved articles which investigated LGBT population experiences in diverse social institutions and time frame from 2009 to 2019. This research was conducted (February-April/2019) in four scientific databases aiming to identify texts in Portuguese. We followed the PICo protocol for elaborating the starting question, the PRISMA for eligibility, and Meta-Aggregation in Phenomenological perspective for analysis. We included fifteen articles and those found are presented in two categories of qualitative synthesis. Pathologization, stigma, and prejudice earmark LGBT relationships and institutions, reinforced by heteronormativity. However, there is a health guarantee from Transexualizer Process. This review points out low evidence about the transgender experience in social environments and portrays that institutional violence stands out in disrespect for human rights. I. INTRODUCTION The sexuality approach has a hard and complex historic referral in Brazil, closely following, although, with great modesty, the unveiling of facts that happened in the Old World, in already developed first-world countries. Foucault (2014) asserts in the first volume of his work The History of Sexuality I that the theme was retracted to the alcoves with European bourgeoisie outbreak when speeches are used as power devices and marriage was unveiled as reproduction-intended, controlling, since then, bodies. The logic that the biological binary man and woman, male and female is the pattern model and adequate puts any other kind of gender and/or sexual identity manifestation, as well as a sexual orientation as an affront to values and moral costumes which are rooted in the patriarchate, a system that has like central figure the father, male, family provider, as well as implementation of heteronormativity as correct conduct (Pinto & Silva, 2019). The State, as a maximum instance, which controls all and everyone, developed what Foucault called as biopower, a mechanism of body domination in any situation that happens outside the patriarchal pattern of a mononuclear and traditional family, establishing, making it a disorder of any other gender expression or sexual manifestation which are not opposed to oneself, as it happened with the madness phenomenon. Therefore, men who had/have sex with men, women who had/have sex with women, people who cross-dress or transit between genders due to their non-recognition with gender and birth biological sex and so many other situations are immediately pathologized. It means a disease to be treated, arising thus homosexualism, lesbianism, transsexualism, hermaphroditism among other terms with suffix -ism