electronics
Article
Overcoming Bottlenecks for Realizing a Vehicle-to-Grid
Infrastructure in Europe through Standardization
Sameer Chandrakant Fulari and Geerten van de Kaa *
Citation: Fulari, S.C.; van de Kaa, G.
Overcoming Bottlenecks for Realizing
a Vehicle-to-Grid Infrastructure in
Europe through Standardization.
Electronics 2021, 10, 582. https://
doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050582
Academic Editor: Sara Deilami
Received: 18 December 2020
Accepted: 18 February 2021
Published: 2 March 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Department of Values, Technology, and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft,
The Netherlands; sameerfulari@gmail.com
* Correspondence: g.vandekaa@tudelft.nl
Abstract: This paper focuses on committee–market standards battles for the case of vehicle-to-grid
technology in Europe. In this battle, standards such as CHArge de MOve (CHAdeMO) and Combined
Charging System (CCS) Combo are competing. The paper identifies relevant factors with the help of
a literature review and expert interviews. Furthermore, the importance weights were established for
the factors. The paper ends with a discussion and conclusion in which the theoretical contributions,
practical implications, limitations, and recommendations for further research are discussed.
Keywords: standards; standards battles; vehicle-to-grid technology; BWM; best–worst method
1. Introduction
The transportation sector is considered one of the significant contributors to the global
carbon footprint [1], and most countries are moving toward the electrification of their
transportation sector. Electric vehicles (EVs) became popular in the last decade. However,
most of these vehicles are parked during peak hours when renewable energy generation
through solar cells is optimal. This results in a tremendous amount of underutilized energy
in the batteries of EVs. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology [2,3] makes it possible to share
that power with the grid. An essential aspect of V2G technology pertains to the charging
equipment used to connect the EVs with the charging stations for charging and discharging
(also known as bidirectional charging). Irrespective of the significant advantages of V2G
technology, it is not being used on a large scale yet because no single dominant standard
for charging is available.
Instead, various types of standards are competing against each other, including
CHArge de MOve (CHAdeMO) and Combined Charging System (CCS) Combo. CHAdeMO,
which originated in Japan and was developed by a consortium of auto manufacturers, is
currently capable of bidirectional charging, while CCS Combo is expected to offer V2G
charging by 2025 [4]. IEC, a formal standardization organization, developed the stan-
dards underlying CCS Combo. Although the charging stations around European countries
include either or both of the two charging standards, the manufacturers of cars, home
chargers, and home batteries are mostly implementing one standard. This may create
high levels of potential uncertainty among consumers when buying these manufacturers’
equipment, because the standard that is applied will become another decision criteria
for consumers.
The decision for a standard will depend upon the value that it offers. This value may
be determined by technological characteristics such as the charging time, but economic
effects will also determine it. Network effects refer to a situation in which the value of
technology increases the more it becomes adopted by other users. For example, the value
will depend upon the number of charging stations that apply the same standard along
the routes that are used by the consumers (direct network effects). The value will also
depend upon the other products already owned by consumers that apply similar standards
Electronics 2021, 10, 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050582 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics