Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 318659, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/318659
Research Article
On Schauder Frames in Conjugate Banach Spaces
S. K. Kaushik,
1
S. K. Sharma,
1
and Khole Timothy Poumai
2
1
Department of Mathematics, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
2
Department of Mathematics, Motilal Nehru College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 021, India
Correspondence should be addressed to S. K. Kaushik; shikk2003@yahoo.co.in
Received 31 August 2012; Accepted 17 November 2012
Academic Editor: Ding-Xuan Zhou
Copyright © 2013 S. K. Kaushik et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Weak
∗
-Schauder frame in conjugate Banach spaces has been introduced and studied. A sufficient condition for the existence of
weak
∗
-Schauder frame in the conjugate space of a separable Banach space has been given. It has been shown that ℓ
∞
has weak
∗
-
Schauder frame. Finally, a sufficient condition for the existence of a Schauder frame sequence has been given.
1. Introduction
Frames for Hilbert spaces were formally introduced by
Duffin and Schaeffer [1]. Later, Daubechies et al. [2] found
new applications to wavelets in which frames played an
important role. Frames are main tools for use in signal
and image processing, compression, sampling theory, optics,
�lter banks, signal detection, and so forth. In order to have
more applications of frames, several notions generalizing the
concept of frames have been introduced and studied, namely,
pseudoframes [3], oblique frames [4], frames of subspaces
(fusion frames) [5], -frames [6], orthogonal frames [7, 8],
and so forth.
Feichtinger and Gröchenig [9] extended the notion of
atomic decomposition to Banach spaces. Gröchenig [10]
introduced a more general concept for Banach spaces called
Banach frame. Banach frames and atomic decompositions
were further studied in [11–14]. Han and Larson [15] de�ned
Schauder frame for a Banach space. In [16], Casazza, et
al. gave various de�nitions of frames for Banach spaces
including that of Schauder frame. In 2008, Casazza et al. [17]
studied the coefficient quantization of Schauder frames in
Banach spaces. Liu [18] gave the concepts of minimal and
maximal associated bases with respect to Schauder frames
and closely connected them with the duality theory. In [19],
Liu and Zheng gave a characterization of Schauder frames
which are near-Schauder bases. In fact, they generalized some
results due to Holub [20]. Beanland et al. [21] proved that the
upper and lower estimates theorems for �nite dimensional
decompositions of Banach spaces can be extended and modi-
�ed to Schauder frames and gave a complete characterization
of duality for Schauder frames. Φ-Schauder frames were
introduced and studied by Vashisht [22]. Recently, Liu [23]
associated an operator with a Schauder frame and called it
Hilbert-Schauder frame operator.
In the present paper, we introduce the concept of weak
∗
-
Schauder frame and weak-Schauder frame in conjugate
Banach spaces. A sufficient condition for the existence of
weak
∗
-Schauder frame in a conjugate Banach space of a
separable Banach space has been given. Also, an example of a
conjugate space of a nonseparable Banach space which has no
weak
∗
-Schauder frame is given. Further, it has been shown
that ℓ
∞
has weak
∗
-Schauder frame. Finally, a sufficient
condition for the existence of a Schauder frame sequence has
been given.
2. Preliminaries
roughout this paper, will denote a Banach space, will
denote a Hilbert space, let
∗
the dual space of , [
] be the
closed linear span of {
} in the norm topology of , and let
be the canonical mapping of into
∗∗
. A series ∑
∞
in
a conjugate Banach space
∗
is called weak-convergent to
if it converges in
∗
,
∗∗
)-topology. In this case, we write
∑
∞
. A series ∑
∞
in a conjugate Banach space
∗
is called weak
∗
-convergent to if it converges in
∗
, )-
topology. In this case, we write
∗
∑
∞
.