KRAS Mutations Predict Progression of Preneoplastic Gastric Lesions
1
Changning Gong, Robertino Mera, Juan C. Bravo,
Bernardo Ruiz, Rafael Diaz-Escamilla,
Elizabeth T. H. Fontham, Pelayo Correa, and
Jay D. Hunt
2
Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology [C. G., J. D. H.],
Pathology [R. M., J. C. B., B. R., R. D. E., E. T. H. F., P. C.], and Public
Health and Preventive Medicine [E. T. H. F.], and the Stanley S. Scott Cancer
Center [R. M., E. T. H. F., P. C., J. D. H.], Louisiana State University Medical
Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Abstract
Eight hundred sixty-three subjects with atrophic gastritis
were recruited to participate in an ongoing
chemoprevention trial in Narin ˜ o, Colombia. The
participants were randomly assigned to intervention
therapies, which included treatment to eradicate
Helicobacter pylori infection followed by daily dietary
supplementation with antioxidant micronutrients in a 2
2 2 factorial design. A series of biopsies of gastric
mucosa were obtained according to a specified protocol
from designated locations in the stomach for each
participant at baseline (before intervention therapy) and
at year three. A systematic sample of 160 participants
was selected from each of the eight treatment
combinations. DNA was isolated from each of these
biopsies (n 320), and the first exon of KRAS was
amplified using PCR. Mutations in the KRAS gene were
detected using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
and confirmed by sequence analysis. Of all baseline
biopsies, 14.4% (23 of 160) contained KRAS mutations.
Among those participants with atrophic gastritis without
metaplasia, 19.4% (6 of 25) contained KRAS mutations,
indicating that mutation of this important gene is likely
an early event in the etiology of gastric carcinoma. An
important association was found between the presence of
KRAS mutations in baseline biopsies and the progression
of preneoplastic lesions. Only 14.6% (20 of 137) of
participants without baseline KRAS mutations progressed
from atrophic gastritis to intestinal metaplasia or from
small intestinal metaplasia to colonic metaplasia;
however, 39.1% (9 of 23) with baseline KRAS mutations
progressed to a more advanced lesion after 3 years
[univariate odds ratio (OR), 3.76 (P 0.05); multivariate
OR adjusted for treatment, 3.74 (P 0.04)]. In addition,
the specificity of the KRAS mutation predicted
progression. For those participants with G3 T
transversions at position 1 of codon 12 (GGT3 TGT),
19.4% (5 of 17) progressed (univariate OR, 2.4); however,
60.0% (3 of 5) of participants with G3 A transitions at
position 1 of codon 12 (GGT3 AGT) progressed
(univariate OR, 8.7; P 0.004 using
2
test).
Introduction
Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world
(1). The 5-year survival rate in the United States is only 21% for
all histological stages (2). According to the Lauren classifica-
tion (3), there are two major types of gastric carcinomas:
intestinal and diffuse. The most frequent gastric malignancy is
the intestinal type, which is often preceded by sequential steps
of precancerous changes (Fig. 1), including atrophic gastritis,
intestinal metaplasia (type I, complete, or small intestinal meta-
plasia; and type III, incomplete, or colonic metaplasia), and
dysplasia (reviewed in Ref. 4). These progressive stages, which
usually proceed over decades, have been defined as a sequence
of histopathological events that confer an increasing risk of
malignant transformation. The conversion of normal epithelial
cells to cancer cells requires the accumulation of multiple
genetic abnormalities. Interestingly, the two types of gastric
carcinoma have some common genetic components but differ in
some important aberrations. Abnormal expression and ampli-
fication of the MET gene, inactivation of the p53 tumor sup-
pressor gene, abnormal transcription of CD44, and loss of
telomeres are common events in both types (5–7). Reduction or
loss of cadherins and catenins and KSAM gene amplification are
unique to the diffuse type of gastric cancer (8). KRAS muta-
tions, ERBB2 gene amplification, LOH
3
and mutations of the
APC gene, LOH of BCL2 gene, and LOH of the DCC locus are
preferentially associated with the intestinal type (8). However,
because few studies have been done on preneoplastic lesions,
the significance of genetic events in gastric carcinogenesis
remains unclear.
Mutations of KRAS are detected in many types of human
malignancies and are associated with the development and
progression of human cancer (9). The KRAS gene encodes a M
r
21,000 membrane-associated protein (p21
RAS
) with intrinsic
GTPase activity involved in cellular signal transduction. Point
mutations of KRAS at specific codons lead to activated onco-
protein (GTP-RAS) with reduced GTPase activity (9). KRAS
codons 12, 13, and 61 are the most frequently detected mutation
“hot spots” in human cancers. The frequency of mutated KRAS
varies greatly among different tumor types. KRAS mutations are
found in 10% of intestinal type gastric carcinomas but are
rarely detected in the diffuse type (8). Very few studies have
been done on premalignant gastric mucosa, and the significance
Received 6/25/98; revised 11/13/98; accepted 11/17/98.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1
This study was supported in part by Program Project Grant P01-CA28842 from
the National Cancer Institute.
2
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Louisiana State Univer-
sity Medical Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1901
Perdido Street, P7-2, New Orleans, LA 70112. Phone: (504) 568-4734; Fax:
(504) 599-1014; E-mail: jhunt@lsumc.edu.
3
The abbreviations used are: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; DGGE, denaturing
gradient gel electrophoresis; OR, odds ratio.
167 Vol. 8, 167–171, February 1999 Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
on July 10, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancer Research. cebp.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from