Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2020) 49:1437–1441
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01723-w
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Bringing More Voices to the Table: Community Responses to Our
Sexual Harassment Guest Editorial
Sari M. van Anders
1,2,3
· Meredith L. Chivers
1
· Lori A. Brotto
4
· Debby Herbenick
5
· Sofa Jawed‑Wessel
6
·
Jayleen Galarza
7
Published online: 13 May 2020
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
When discussions of sexual harassment are on the table, who
feels able to pull up a chair? Not everyone feels entitled or
able to take up space in academic journals or resist the poten-
tial blowback doing so often entails. The list of commentary
authors who pulled themselves a chair and the context of their
comments on our Guest Editorial (Herbenick et al., 2019) is,
on balance, a clear and ironic/unironic representation of major
axes of power. On the one hand, feminist theories predict that
those experiencing oppression and critically engaging with
those experiences will be best positioned to think through
that oppression, including who perpetrates it, who maintains
it, whom it benefts, what can change it, as well as who resists
eforts towards equity. On the other hand, feminist theories
also predict that those who beneft from oppression will pro-
tect the status quo and resist both challenges to it and attempts
towards more equitable distributions of power. So, the pattern
of commenters’ social locations is not surprising, nor are their
comments. Yet, to presume this pattern is refective of the
response to our Guest Editorial would be a grossly partial and
incomplete view. Indeed, the response to our Guest Editorial
has been broad and far-reaching.
We appreciate the support from three positive commentar-
ies for the concerns we raised about sexual harassment in sex
research (Byers, Mustanski, Semenya, Suschinsky, & Vilain,
2020; Sánchez, 2019; Seto, 2019). This included Byers et al.
representing the International Academy of Sex Research
(IASR) and, in addition, Sánchez recounting his own expe-
rience of racism in academia and Seto calling for empirical
research on perpetrators of sexual harassment. These three
commentaries in the academic record were not, however, the
only supportive feedback our Guest Editorial prompted. The
response has been much bigger.
The quantifed metrics of the response to our Guest Edito-
rial help to demonstrate its reach. Since it went online only
about a year ago, Altmetrics shows that there have been over
12,000 downloads and 587 shares. According to Altmetrics,
this puts it in the top 5% of all “outputs” of a similar age that
it tracks, #31 of all Archives of Sexual Behavior publications
(ever), and #1 of all outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
of a similar age. “Altmetric has tracked 14,288,069 research
outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these, this one
has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it’s in
the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric”
(Altmetric, 2020; boldface material removed).
Beyond metrics, we have been heartened and moved by the
immense outpouring of support for our Guest Editorial. We
have given an invited talk on sexual harassment in sex research,
prompted by the Guest Editorial, at the 2019 annual meeting
of the Canadian Sex Research Forum (CSRF) in Victoria that
itself spurred much positive discussion. We have heard from
colleagues in sex research and other disciplines, including at
multiple career stages, that our Guest Editorial helped them
to consider how to address sexual harassment and even how
their own past actions may have been sexual harassment. Col-
leagues—ones we know and new ones we have met—have
included our Guest Editorial in lab meetings, academic society
* Sari M. van Anders
sva5@queensu.ca
1
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, 62 Arch St.,
Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
2
Department of Gender Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston,
ON, Canada
3
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University,
Kingston, ON, Canada
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University
of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
5
School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington,
IN, USA
6
School of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska,
Lincoln, NB, USA
7
Department of Social Work and Gerontology, Shippensburg
University, Shippensburg, PA, USA