Outcomes of 4-Snip Punctoplasty for Severe Punctal
Stenosis: Measurement of Tear Meniscus Height by
Optical Coherence Tomography
SUNG EUN KIM, SUNG JUN LEE, SANG YEUL LEE, AND JIN SOOK YOON
●
PURPOSE: To investigate the surgical outcome of rect-
angular 4-snip punctoplasty, a modification of rectangu-
lar 3-snip procedures, using objective measurements.
●
DESIGN: Noncomparative case series.
●
METHODS: The medical charts of patients who un-
derwent rectangular 4-snip punctoplasty for severe
punctal stenosis with at least 6 months follow-up were
reviewed. Before surgery and at 1 and 6 months after
surgery, subjective evaluation of tearing was assessed
using Munk scores. The size of the punctum was
graded based on slit-lamp examination, and measure-
ment of tear meniscus height was done using Fourier-
domain optical coherence tomography.
●
RESULTS: A total of 45 eyes (26 patients) were stud-
ied. The subjective epiphora score was significantly
reduced after surgery and maintained until 6 months
after the surgery (
2
for trend test, P < .001). The grade
of the punctum size was also significantly enlarged after
surgery and the enlarged punctum was maintained until 6
months after the surgery (
2
for trend test, P < .001).
The mean preoperative tear height (452.4 249.3 m)
was significantly reduced both at 1 month after surgery
(341.6 207.9 m; P .003, paired t test) and at 6
months after surgery (362.1 212.6 m; P .004,
paired t test). The functional success rate was 93.3% and
anatomic success rate was 88.9% at 6 months after
surgery.
●
CONCLUSIONS: Rectangular 4-snip punctoplasty was
an anatomically and functionally effective procedure for
severe punctal stenosis patients, maintaining large puncta
for fairly long periods. (Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:
769 –773. © 2012 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
P
UNCTAL STENOSIS CAN BE EASILY TREATED BY
punctoplasty, namely the snip procedures. The sur-
gery for stenosis involves a 1-, 2-, or 3-snip puncto-
plasty. There are debates as to the number of cuts or the
direction of the snip(s) that is best to prevent recurrence of
epiphora and achieve anatomic and functional success.
The 1-snip procedure refers to a single vertical snip down
to the ampulla, which produces a high rate of failure
attributable to reapproximation of the adjacent raw cut
ends.
1,2
To solve this problem, a 2-snip variation of the
surgery was suggested by Jones.
3
This procedure consists of
removing a V-shaped wedge from the vertical portion of
the canaliculus on the conjunctival surface.
More recently, the 3-snip procedure has become more
widely adopted than the 1-snip or 2-snip procedure.
4,5
The
traditional 3-snip, specifically the triangular 3-snip proce-
dure, is a posterior ampullectomy, which removes the
triangular-shaped ampulla by a first cut at the vertical
canaliculus, followed by a second cut along the horizontal
canaliculus and a final snip at the base.
6
A rectangular
3-snip punctoplasty, which involves 2 vertical snips at
either side of the ampulla and a cut at the base, was
recently reported to have high functional and anatomic
success rates.
4,7
The higher success rates are thought to
be attributable to the preservation of physiology, as only
the vertical portion of posterior ampulla is excised, and
the anatomy and physiological functions of the lacrimal
system are preserved.
At our institute, we have performed the traditional
triangular 3-snip procedure and experienced relatively
high rates of reapproximation, which led to more recent
adoption of rectangular 3-snip punctoplasty. However, we
observed that in cases of severe punctal stenosis, the
punctum could not be sufficiently dilated to allow 2
vertical cuts. In addition, the size of the rectangular
punctum left by this procedure was not large enough to
resolve the epiphora found in severe stenotic cases.
Therefore, we modified the rectangular 3-snip procedure
to create a rectangular 4-snip to maximize the punctum size,
and prevent re-stenosis in cases of severe punctal stenosis.
This procedure includes a small portion of the horizontal
canaliculus in the rectangular flap. In this study, we retro-
spectively reviewed the outcomes of this new procedure.
METHODS
THE MEDICAL CHARTS OF THE PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT
rectangular 4-snip procedure for severe punctal stenosis
Accepted for publication Sept 21, 2011.
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Myongji Hospital, Kwan-
dong University College of Medicine, Koyang, Korea (S.E.K.); Depart-
ment of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk
University, Seoul, Korea (S.J.L.); and Institute of Vision Research,
Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine,
Seoul, Korea (S.Y.L., J.S.Y.).
Inquiries to Jin Sook Yoon, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei
University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchondong Seodaemungu,
Seoul, Korea, 120-752; e-mail: yoonjs@yuhs.ac
© 2012 BY ELSEVIER INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 0002-9394/$36.00 769
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.026